IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, ROMESH VERMA, JJ.
State of H.P. - Appellant
Versus
Gurmel Singh & Ors. – Respondents
Cr. Appeal No. 222 of 2014
Decided On : 28-10-2025
JUDGMENT :
ROMESH VERMA, J.
The present appeal arises out of the judgment of acquittal as passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge(1), Kangra at Dharamshala, H.P, dated 29.06.2013 in a police challan filed under Section 302/34 of Indian Penal Code (for short, IPC), in case FIR No. 109 of 2011 dated 4.4.2011, registered at Police Station, Indora, District Kangra, H.P., whereby the present respondent has been acquitted of the aforesaid charges.
2. The story of the prosecution, as projected, is that on 4th April 2011 at 12.40 p.m. in the afternoon, the President of Gram Panchayat, Paral, made a telephonic call at Chowki Thakur Dwara that Vijay Kumar, son of Shri Ajit Singh, was beaten up by Gurmel Singh and Subhash Chand (accused/respondent herein) and on account of this Vijay Kumar (Victim) was taken to Government Hospital Hazipur. On the said information, ASI/IO Ashwani Kumar made a telephonic call to doctor Sukhdev M.D , CHC on his telephone number and inquired about the health of Vijay Kumar. The doctor informed the I.O. that the victim is unconscious. Thereafter, ASI Ashwani Kumar along with Rajiv Kumar went to the spot at Village Paral and statement of father of Sh. Vijay Kumar under Section 154 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was recorded. Father of victim made a statement that he is a permanent resident of said area and he is an agriculturist by profession and his son Sh. Vijay Kumar on 03.11.2011 at about 6.30 p.m. in the evening went to the house of Sh. Malquiat Singh for having dinner and to attend jagrata. His son told him that he will come back soon. However, when his son did not return till 3:00.a.m in the morning, he went towards the house of Malquiat Singh. After some distance, he heard noise of beatings by certain persons. Immediately when he reached the spot, he saw that his son was being beaten up in order to end his life. When he raised hue and cry, then the persons, who gave beatings, ran away from the spot. However, he identified Gurmel Singh @ Gelu and Sh. Subhash Chand resident of Paral. He stated that the aforesaid two persons in order to kill his son gave beatings and he suffered injuries on his head. Thereafter his family members informed the police and Vijay Kumar was taken to hospital at Hazipur. Immediately, after some time, Sh. Vijay Kumar died due to injuries and postmortem was conducted at Government Hospital Nurpur. Thereafter, Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code was deleted and Section 302 of IPC was inserted in the FIR. The spot map was prepared and the spot was got photographed. On the spot, the clothes of Sh. Vijay Kumar, which were worn by him were taken into possession and seizure memo, to this effect was prepared. After the incident, the accused Gurmel Singh @ Gelu and Subhash Chand fled away from the scene of occurrence and subsequently they were arrested by the Investigating Officer. It was stated that the accused persons told that about 4-5 months back they had lend Rs.1,000/-to Vijay Kumar, out of which Rs.700/- was given by Subhash Chand and Rs.300/- was given by Gurmel Singh to him. Despite asking for the said amount Vijay Kumar did not repay the said amount.
3. During the investigation, it was found that the accused on 03.4.2011 in the afternoon were sitting beside a rivulet and they had consumed liquor. They were having some left out liquor and in the evening both the accused persons consumed the same. On the date of occurrence in the night at about 01.30 to 2.00 a.m., the accused persons went towards the house of Malquiat Singh because there was jagrata in his house. Gurmel Singh and Subhash Chand took the deceased Vijay Kumar out of the house. They started hurling abuses upon him.
4. It has also come in the investigation that when Vijay Kumar refused to repay the amount of Rs.1000/- to the accused persons, then at a distance of 50 to 60 meters, the head of Vijay Kumar was banged on the bricks of path. As a result of which his clothes and vest were torn. Due to beatings given
In appeals against acquittal, courts must find overwhelming evidence of guilt; mere suspicion is insufficient for conviction.
Appellate interference in acquittal justified only if perverse or sole guilt view possible; contradictions in key testimonies, FIR delay, recovery doubts sustain acquittal.
Order of acquittal - Confirmed - Scope of section 378 Cr.P.C. and interference by High Court in an appeal has been considered makes it clear that order of acquittal in this case is not one which coul....
Point if Law: Merely because appellate court on re-appreciation and re-evaluation of the evidence is inclined to take a different view, interference with judgment of acquittal is not justified if vie....
Appeal against acquittal under NDPS Act dismissed; trial court's view upheld as not perverse due to witness contradictions, procedural lapses like unrecorded prior information, no independent witness....
An appellate court may reappraise evidence in acquittal appeals but maintains double presumption of innocence, requiring clear support for findings before altering trial court decisions.
Appellate courts should not interfere with acquittal if trial court's view is reasonably possible, reinforced by double presumption of innocence; reversal only if perverse or compelling circumstances....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.