SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1518

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
Layak Ram & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & Ors. - Respondents
CWP No. 9499 of 2025
Decided On : 17-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ram Krishan Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General, Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate

Cooperative society holds primary authority to decide membership applications per bye-laws, subject to Registrar appeal; regulatory committee cannot directly reject but only oversee eligibility post-induction, without overriding statutory family definition.

Headnote:(A) Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1968 - Sections 2(8), 17 - Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Societies Rules, 1971 - Rule 15 - Cooperative Society Bye-laws Nos. 6, 7, 8, 18, 28(iv) - Membership admission - Society's Managing Committee, subject to General Body approval, decides applications; Registrar hears appeals - Regulatory Committee lacks jurisdiction to directly decide or reject membership; role limited to overseeing eligibility of inducted members per society's parameters - Cannot override Act, Rules, Bye-laws or alter statutory 'family' definition (husband, wife, unmarried sons/daughters) via administrative order - Applications rejected/expulsions based on Committee's decisions quashed; Registrar to reconsider afresh per rules occupying field. (Paras 3(i), 4(i), 4(ii), 4(iii))

(B) Administrative Orders - Limits - Cannot supplant statutory framework governing cooperative societies; prior complications from redefining 'family' resolved by reading administrative definition harmoniously with Act. (Paras 3(v), 4(iii))

Facts of the case:
Petitioners applied for membership in registered cooperative society, deposited fees/share money; memberships initially confirmed but later rejected/expelled by Regulatory Committee and society citing non-compliance with administrative conditions, including family definition and employment restrictions, despite prior judicial quashing of similar rejections.

Findings of Court:
Impugned rejection order and expulsion resolution quashed; Registrar directed to consider applications afresh within eight weeks, communicating decision to petitioners, in light of statutory provisions and prior directives.

Issues: Whether Regulatory Committee can directly reject membership applications bypassing society's Managing Committee/General Body and Registrar; validity of administrative conditions overriding bye-laws/Act on family definition and eligibility.

Ratio Decidendi: Sole prerogative of society to first decide membership per Bye-law 8, appealable to Registrar; Regulatory Committee cannot usurp this, limited to post-induction oversight; statutory 'family' definition prevails over administrative alterations; fresh consideration required post-quashing of prior flawed orders.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. membership governed by society bylaws. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. regulatory committee formed for membership oversight. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT :

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J

The Regulatory Committee-respondent No.5 rejected petitioners’ applications on 14.02.2025 (Annexure P-18) for becoming members of respondent No.6-Society. Based upon this decision a resolution was passed on 21.04.2025 by respondent No.6-Soceity cancelling memberships of petitioners. Aggrieved, petitioners have instituted this petition.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the case file.

3. Following facts are not in dispute: -

3(i) Respondent No.6 is a Society registered on 24.03.2000 under the provisions of Himachal Pradesh Cooperative Societies Act, 1968. Its Byelaws have been duly approved by the competent authority. Membership of the Society is governed by its Byelaws, relevant to the context are reproduced hereunder: -

“6. Subject to the provisions of Act, Rules and the Bye-Laws, any individual who is hereditary resident of area of operation and also having ancestral land shall be eligible for admission as member of the society if he/she owns trucks, but not more than 3 trucks.

Provided that:-

a) an individual who has got valid papers indicating there in that, he/she will be able to have one truck within a period of one year in any one of the above systems i.e. ownership, shall also be eligible to become member of the Society.

b) the person who has hereditary land rights in the area of operation of the society and whose land has been acquired for plant site, Conveyor Belt and for the Mines & not for any other purposes in the above panchayats.

c) not more than one person from a family shall be enrolled as member.

d) A member shall not be entitled to have more than three trucks at a time.

e) a member shall have to submit land loosers certificate within three months from Revenue Authority.

7. No individual shall be member of the society, if,

i) he has applied for bankruptcy.

ii) he has been declared insolvent

ⅲ) he has been sentenced for dishonesty or moral turpitude.

8. Application for admission as members shall be disposed of by the Managing Committee subject to approval of General Body. If the Managing Committee or General Body refuses to admit a person, it shall record its reasons for refusal and communicate them to the person, concerned. Any person, who has been refused admission shall have the right of an appeal to the Registrar within one month of the date of communication of refusal. The decision of the Registrar on such appeal shall be binding on the society and the appellant.

9. ……

10. Every member on the admission shall sign his name or make his thumbmark in the register of members and shall pay an admission fee of Rs.100@.

11-17…………

18. Each member shall purchase at least one share of the value of Rs. 5000/- each in lump sum at the time of admission.”

Under Bye-law No. 28(iv), the General Body of the Society has been vested with powers of confirmation of the admission of the members.

In accordance with above Bye-laws, the petitioners applied for the membership of respondent No.6-Society by depositing the requisite admission and membership fees etc. Respondent No.6-Society accepted the share money and membership fees deposited by the petitioners. Membership of petitioner No.1 was confirmed on 27.04.2014, whereas, membership of petitioners No.2 & 3 were confirmed on 05.06.2016.

3(ii) In the meanwhile, the District Magistrate, Solan, issued an office order on 26.03.2010 constituting a Regulatory Committee for looking into the enrollment of new members of the societies operating in the area in order to avoid membership disputes. The reasons for constituting the Regulatory Committee were assigned as under in the order: -

“During the above mentioned meetings/deliberations it came to the notice of the undersigned that some of the Transport Societies have been flouting the provisions of earlier orders vis-a-vis issue of new membership and number of trucks

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top