SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1552

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA, J.
Anil Kumar - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & Others - Respondents
CWPOA No.620 of 2019
Decided on : 22-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Shivalik Bhaik, Advocate vice Ms. Shalini Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner.
For the Respondents:Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General,

No right to change compassionate appointment from daily wage Class-IV to Class-III post after policy-compliant acceptance; barred by unchallenged policy, lack of parity with regular employee dependents, delay, laches, and no vested right.

Headnote:(A) Service Law - Compassionate appointment - Dependent of work charge employee validly appointed as daily wage Class-IV post per modified policy dated 16.08.2005 - No locus or right to seek change to daily wage Class-III post dehors policy - Policy not assailed - No parity with dependents of regular employees - Clause 11 of policy dated 18.01.1990 bars change after acceptance - Plea of discrimination impermissible absent vested right or wholesome similarity - Compassionate appointment not source of recruitment but to tide over crisis - No endless compassion - Delayed claim after 5 years barred by laches. (Paras 6(i) to 8)

(B) Limitation - Service matters - Belated representation does not revive stale claim - Inaction from 2006 to 2011 without explanation disentitles relief - Mere pendency or decision on representation no fresh cause of action. (Paras 6(vi) to 6(vi-e))

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, dependent of work charge daily wage employee who died in service, applied for compassionate appointment in 2006, appointed as daily wage Class-IV post per applicable policy, joined in September 2006. Sought change to Class-III post citing judgments granting similar relief to others whose deceased parents were regular employees, via representation in 2011 and writ petition thereafter.

Findings of Court:
Petition dismissed; no change in post directed; no consequential benefits; pending applications disposed of.

Issues: Whether right to change compassionate post from Class-IV to Class-III exists dehors policy; parity with differently situated cases; effect of delay and laches; applicability of discrimination plea.

Ratio Decidendi: Appointment per unchallenged policy valid; no right to higher post after acceptance without demur; parity claim fails as unequals; stale claim not revived by belated representation; discretion of authorities in post allocation not question-able absent patent illegality.

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. compassionate appointment as beldar after father's work-charge death. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. 2005 policy requires daily wage for work-charge dependents. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court considers facts, circumstances, and parties' submissions. (Para 9 , 10)

Judgment :

Ranjan Sharma, J.

Petitioner, Anil Kumar, had initially filed CWP No. 9281 of 2011, and upon establishment of State Administrative Tribunal the matter was transferred to Tribunal and now after its abolition, the matter stands transferred to this Court, as CWPOA No.620 0f 2019, seeking the following relief(s):-

“(i). For issuing a writ of Mandamus to the respondents for appointing the petitioner as a Clerk on Compassionate Grounds instead of his present compassionate appointment as Beldar, with all consequential benefits.

FACTUAL MATRIX:

2. Grievance of the petitioner is that his father Late Shri Chanan Singh, died during service on 21.05.2004 while working as Beldar on work charge basis, in Irrigation and Public Health Department. Petitioner applied for compassionate appointment on 04.05.2006 [Annexure P-2]. He was appointed as Beldar on daily wage basis on 02.09.2006 [Annexure P-3], and he joined on 11.09.2006 as Beldar [Class-IV] on daily wage basis and continued as such on daily wage basis.

2(i). It is averred that the petitioner came across the judgment dated 05.03.2011 [Annexure P-4] passed in CWP No.972 of 2011 and connected matters, in the case of Ram Chander versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others to assert that the State Authorities have granted the benefit of change in post to Ram Chander from daily wage Beldar [Class-IV] to Clerk [Class-III] on daily wage basis as per Orders dated 16.05.2011 [Annexure P-5]. It is further averred that similar change in post was granted to one Shri Neter Singh, who had filed O.A. No.1025 of 2007 by the State Authorities on 17.05.2010 [Annexure P-5, Colly]. In the light of the judgments in the case of Ram Chander and Neter Singh (supra), the petitioner submitted a representation on 01.09.2011 [Annexure P-6], seeking similar benefit by changing his post from daily wage Beldar [Class-IV] to daily wage Clerk [Class-III] in the Department.

In this background, the petitioner had filed the instant petition, claiming appointment as a Clerk [Class-III] on daily wage basis from the post of Daily Wage Beldar [Class-IV] on the analogy on which change in post was granted to other persons, including Ram Chander and Neter Singh, as referred to above, with all consequential benefits.

STAND OF STATE AUTHORITIES:

3. Pursuant to the issuance of notice by this Court on 04.11.2011, Respondents No.1 to 3 have filed Reply-Affidavit dated 27.02.2012 of Superintending Engineer, IPH Circle, Nahan.

3(i). Perusal of the Reply-Affidavit indicates that the father of the petitioner died on 21.05.2004 and thereafter the petitioner-Anil Kumar applied for job on compassionate grounds in May 2006 and while his application was pending, the State Government issued the modified policy vide OM dated 16.08.2005 [Annexure R-1], stipulating that, in case, the deceased employee was work charge employee or was a daily wager having rendered more than 07 year of daily wage service then in such cases, the appointment was to be offered on daily wage only. In Para 2(c) of Reply-Affidavit, the State Authorities have distinguished the cases of Ram Chander and Netar Singh by stating that respective fathers of Ram Chander and Netar Singh died while working as regular Beldar(s) and therefore, Ram Chander and Netar Singh were appointed on regular basis, on compassionate grounds as per norms and the judgments in case of Ram Chander and Netar Singh were distinguishable.

3(ii). In Para 2(d) & (i) of the Reply-Affidavit, the State Authorities have stated that the petitioner was appointed as a daily wage Beldar on 11.09.2006 whereas the instant petition was filed belatedly in the year 2011, after 5 years.

In these circumstances, a prayer is made for dismiss


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top