SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1695

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
Prem Lal - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and Others – Respondents
CWP No.585 of 2024
Decided On : 27-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan and Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General.

Part-time workers appointed by Gram Panchayats for government department schemes, funded by state grants with prior approval, entitled to conversion to daily wage after eight years continuous service; no discrimination with similar categories.

Headnote:(A) Panchayati Raj Act - Section 135 - Part-time workers appointed by Gram Panchayats with prior approval of competent authority, performing duties integral to government department's water supply schemes, and remunerated from government grant-in-aid, entitled to conversion from part-time to daily wage service after eight years continuous service as per policy dated 05.05.2020 - No discrimination with other similar categories like Chowkidars, Technical Assistants already converted - Mere appointment by Panchayat does not disentitle from government service benefits when funding and control vest with state. (Paras 3,5,6,27,28,30)

(B) Service Law - Regularization policies - Parity mandatory among similarly situated part-time employees across Panchayats, Panchayat Samitis, Zila Parishads - Appointments under statutory powers require government concurrence, rendering workers government employees for policy benefits - Long continuous service creates legitimate expectation. (Paras 8,10,11,29)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner appointed as part-time Jal Rakshak by Gram Panchayat since 01.05.2012, working continuously over 13 years without interruption, performing water distribution duties, honorarium paid by government department enhanced to Rs.5600/- per month - Sought conversion to daily wage after eight years per policy dated 05.05.2020 - Respondents denied claiming not department employee but Panchayat appointee under MOU.

Findings of Court:
Services to be converted from part-time to daily wager forthwith within eight weeks per policy dated 05.05.2020 - No financial benefits backdated, but seniority protected from due date for future regularization.

Issues: Whether part-time Jal Rakshak appointed by Gram Panchayat qualifies for conversion to daily wage under government policy; whether government funding and departmental duties render such workers government employees despite Panchayat appointment.

Ratio Decidendi: Court held Panchayat appointments for government schemes with state funds and approval make workers eligible for conversion policies; parity with benefited categories imperative, rejecting departmental camouflage to deny benefits; long service and welfare state obligations mandate equity. Result : Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. part-time workers convertible to daily wage after 8 years. (Para 1 , 2 , 5)
2. gram panchayats appoint jal rakshaks with department oversight. (Para 3 , 6)
3. state funding integrates panchayat workers into government service. (Para 4 , 7 , 8)
4. panchayat teachers, assistants granted regularization despite appointment source. (Para 9 , 10)
5. uniform conversion policy for all state-funded panchayat staff. (Para 11)
6. court orders service conversion with protected seniority. (Para 12)

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

Petitioner herein, who has been working as Jal Rakshak on part-time basis since 01.05.2012, is aggrieved of inaction on the part of respondents to convert his part-time service into daily wage service on completion of eight years of service on part-time basis, in terms of Policy dated 05.05.2020.

2. Pleadings adduced on record by the respective parties though clearly suggest that petitioner herein, who was given appointment as Jal Rakshak on part-time basis by Gram Panchayat concerned, has been working regularly without there being any interruption for more than 13 years, but yet no steps have been taken by the respondents to convert his part-time service into daily wage service in terms of Policy dated 05.05.2020, whereby Government itself decided to convert the part-time service of an employee to daily wage service.

3. Though in reply, respondents have fairly admitted factum with regard to employment of the petitioner on part-time basis as Jal Rakshak, but his prayer for conversion of his service from part-time basis to daily wager has been refuted on the ground that he is not an employee of the Jal Shakti Vibhag, rather he has been working on the instructions issued by Gram Panchayat Mangal. It is further averred in the reply that petitioner’s appointment, if any, to the post of Jal Rakshak on part-time basis is pursuant to Memorandum of Understanding arrived inter se Gram Panchayat Mangal and Jal Shakti Vibhag, whereby number of persons came to be deployed to supervise the distribution/supply of water to number of villages falling under the jurisdiction of Gram Panchayat Mangal. There is no dispute that honorarium, which has now been enhanced to Rs.5600/- per month, is being paid by Jal Shakti Vibhag. It is also not in dispute that all part-time workers of Gram Panchayats, Panchayat Samitis and Zila Parishads have been granted benefit in terms of Notification/Policy of converting services of part-time workers to daily wagers as well as regularisation. As per Section 135 of Panchayati Raj Act, Gram Panchayat is empowered to appoint part-time Chowkidars, but they also appoint Jal Rakshak, Technical Assistant and Panchayat Sahayaks with the prior approval of the competent authority. Though appointments qua the post in question, as detailed hereinabove, are given by Gram Panchayats, but admittedly major share of salary/wages of employees is paid by the Government.

4. Though Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, while referring to the reply filed by respondents, attempted to argue that Recruitment and Promotion Rules to the post of Pump Attendant, Class-IV (Non-Gazetted) in the Department of Irrigation and Public Health Department, Himachal Pradesh, clearly provide that posts of Pump Attendant (Class-IV) shall be filled up from amongst Beldars, who possess five years experience of working with pump motors and electrical accessories strictly on the basis of seniority/induction from Water Guards after completion of 12 years of service with 3 years experience of working with pump, motor and electrical accessories, however, this Court sees no reason to go into the aforesaid aspect of the matter, because in the case at hand because petitioner is not seeking promotion to the post of Pump Attendant, rather his precise case is that after having completed eight years service on part-time basis, his services ought to have been converted into daily wage services, as has been done in the cases of number o



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top