IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA
Parvinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
National Highway Authority of India Through its Project Director (PIU) Tehsil District Hamirpur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitration delayed post-advanced stage due to arbitrator change. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. respondents do not oppose mandate extension. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. section 29a allows court extension of award timeline. (Para 9) |
| 4. supreme court permits post-expiry extension for sufficient cause. (Para 10 , 11) |
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, Judge
Petitioner-Parvinder Singh has come up before this Court, under Section 29-A (4) (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking following relief(s):-
“That the period from 13.08.2025 onwards may kindly be regularized and the mandate of the arbitrator may kindly be extended for a reasonable time.”
FACTUAL MATRIX:
2. Grievance of the petitioner is that the Central Government issued a Notification under the National Highways Act for acquiring the land at Hamirpur Bypass of National Highway-103 and National Highway-3 (Design change KM 121+175 to KM 138=295 of village Kamlah Mouzajangal Ropa, Tehsil and District Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh was acquired, in terms of the Award No. 27/2022 dated 13.06.2023.
2(i) Feeling dissatisfied against the Award, the petitioner filed a Reference before Learned Arbitrator-cum-Divisional Commissioner, Man
TATA Sons Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly TATA Sons Ltd.) vs. Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd.
Court extends arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4)(5) post-expiry for sufficient cause where proceedings advanced, delay administrative, not petitioner's fault, ensuring logical and expeditious ....
Court may extend arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4)(5) post-expiry if sufficient cause shown, such as advanced proceedings and delay not attributable to parties, to ensure logical conclusion a....
Court extends arbitrator mandate post-expiry under Sec 29A(4),(5) on sufficient cause like advanced proceedings, non-attributable delay, ensuring logical conclusion without petitioner fault.
Court extends arbitrator's mandate post-termination under Section 29A(5) for sufficient cause like procedural and administrative delays not attributable to petitioner, ensuring practical, expeditious....
Court may extend arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4),(5) post-termination for sufficient cause not attributable to petitioners, prioritizing pragmatic and effective arbitral conclusion.
Extension of arbitration proceedings mandated by the court when delays are not attributable to the parties, ensuring fairness in the arbitral process.
The court ruled that extensions of time for arbitral proceedings are warranted when delays are not attributable to the parties, prioritizing efficiency and justice in the arbitration process.
The court can extend the time for arbitral proceedings under sufficient cause, preventing parties from suffering due to delays not attributable to them.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.