IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, ROMESH VERMA
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Romesh Verma, J.
The present appeal arises out of judgment of conviction, as passed by the learned Special Judge-II, Kinnaur at Rampur Bushahr, District Shimla, dated 27.4.2023, in case FIR No.2/2022, dated 2.1.2022, registered at Police Station Brow, District Kullu, whereby the convict/appellant has been convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 29(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.
2 The story, as projected by the prosecution, is that on 2.1.2022 PW15 HC Anupam along with HC Jagdish Kumar, PW5 Constable Avinash Badal, Head Constable Sandeep Kumar, HC Kesar, Constable Ajay Kumar and Constable Hukam Chand proceeded on patrolling and traffic checking duty in their private vehicles vide rapat No. Ext.P1/PW5 in the areas of Kullu, Bhuntar, Banjar, Anni, Nirmand etc. They were having IO kit, search light, laptop with them. When the police party was present at place Bazirbowli, at about 5.20 P.M., an HRTC bus bear
State of Himachal Pradesh vs. Trilok Chand
Hanif Khan alias Annu Khan vs. Central Bureau of Narcotics
Union of India vs. Leen Martin
Ritesh Chakravarthy vs. State of M.P.
Material contradictions in key witness testimonies on contraband possession vitiate NDPS prosecution case, entitling accused to acquittal on benefit of doubt despite recovery.
Appeal against acquittal under NDPS Act: Interference only if trial court's view perverse or impossible; here, witness inconsistencies, procedural lapses justify upholding acquittal.
Appellate interference in acquittal limited to perverse findings or sole guilt view; upheld where contradictions, non-examination of independent witnesses, and custody lapses render prosecution case ....
Material contradictions in prosecution witnesses, non-examination of material witness, hostile independent witness, and procedural inconsistencies entitle accused to benefit of doubt resulting in acq....
Acquittal under NDPS Section 20 upheld in appeal; no interference absent perversity where independent witnesses turn hostile denying recovery and contradictions undermine prosecution evidence.
Appeal against NDPS acquittal dismissed upholding trial court due to contradictions in official testimonies, document/FIR anomalies, weight discrepancies creating reasonable doubt; appellate interfer....
NDPS conviction upheld in chance recovery despite hostile independent witness and minor official contradictions; non-association of independents not fatal; case property integrity via intact seals; S....
Point of Law : In a case under the NDPS Act, reverse burden applies. Once the prosecution discharges its initial burden, it is for the accused to explain, though the standard of proof for both is dif....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.