SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1800

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, ROMESH VERMA, JJ.
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Manish Kumar – Respondent
Cr. Appeal No. 445 of 2015
Decided On : 05-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Yashwardhan Chauhan
For the Respondents: N.K. Thakur, Divya Raj Singh

Acquittal under NDPS Section 20 upheld in appeal; no interference absent perversity where independent witnesses turn hostile denying recovery and contradictions undermine prosecution evidence.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20 - Appeal against acquittal - Chance recovery of contraband weighing 1.700 kg from bag thrown by person emerging from bushes during traffic check - Independent witnesses turned hostile, denying apprehension, recovery and entire proceedings - Contradictions in number of seal impressions (three vs. four), seal material, arrest memo signed by witness admitted absent from spot, NCB forms mentioning FIR number despite spot preparation, undated unproven photographs - Prosecution evidence full of infirmities going to root of case - Acquittal not perverse, warrants no interference. (Paras 14-16, 20-55)

(B) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Appeals against acquittal - Appellate court has full power to review evidence but must bear double presumption of innocence; interference only if findings perverse, based on misreading evidence or only guilt-consistent view possible - If two reasonable views possible, acquittal not to be disturbed. (Paras 13-16)

Facts of the case:
Police party on nakabandi and traffic checking intercepted motorcycle; person from bushes threw pithu bag containing charas, apprehended; weighed, sealed, personal search conducted; independent witnesses associated but later deposed nothing happened in their presence, signatures obtained later; trial court acquitted; state appealed.

Findings of Court:
Prosecution case collapses due to hostile independent witnesses denying substratum events, unexplained contradictions in official testimonies and documents; photographs unproved; no prejudice explanation for absent witness signature on arrest memo.

Issues: Scope of interference in acquittal appeals; effect of hostile independent witnesses in chance recovery cases; credibility of prosecution evidence amid contradictions on seals, documents and witness presence.

Ratio Decidendi: Trial court rightly acquitted as independent witnesses shattered prosecution story by denying recovery and apprehension; material contradictions (seals, NCB forms, arrest memo) unexplained, rendering official evidence unreliable; acquittal based on plausible view, not perverse.

Result: Appeal dismissed; acquittal upheld.

Table of Content
1. chance recovery of 1.700kg charas during naka check. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. state challenges perverse acquittal; defense supports judgment. (Para 10 , 11)
3. limited appellate interference absent perversity in acquittal. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. io details apprehension, weighing, sealing of contraband. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)
5. independent witnesses hostile, deny recovery entirely. (Para 20 , 21 , 37 , 38 , 39)
6. officials confirm procedural steps and custody chain. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
7. contradictions, lapses discredit prosecution evidence. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
8. proof must exclude reasonable doubt beyond suspicion. (Para 55 , 56)
9. appeal dismissed; acquittal upheld as plausible. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)

JUDGMENT :

ROMESH VERMA, J.

1. The present appeal arises out of judgment, as passed by the learned Special Judge-II, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., in Sessions Trial No. 34/2014, dated 20.1.2015, whereby the accused-respondent has been acquitted of the charge under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the Act) in case FIR No. 66/13, dated 10.12.2013, registered at Police Station, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P.

2. The story of the prosecution, as projected, is that on 10.12.2013, vide Rapat No.11 Ex. PW-6/A HC Kartar Singh alongwith HC Bhagwan Chand, HC Inder Singh (PW-5), HHC Sanjay Kumar (PW-1), Constable Subhash Chand, Constable Surinder Singh (PW-4) proceeded in the vehicle No. HP-73-0918 being driven by Constable Hem Raj towards Goli, Devi Dehra, Gadhiyar side in connection with Nakabandi and traffic checking duty and they accordingly, laid a nakka at about 3.35 P.M. near Chohda Dam road Dhared. When the police party was checking the vehicles, then at about 3.55 P.M. two persons sitting on motor cycle No. HP47-4360 PULSAR came from the Dam side and their motorcycle was intercepted by the police party. When HC Kartar Singh (PW-13) started checking the documents of the motor cycle, then all of a sudden, one person holding a rucksack (Pithu bag) on his shoulder appeared from the bushes. After seeing the police, the said person got perplexed and threw his bag in the bushes at a distance of ten meters and started running towards Dam side. HC Inder Singh (PW-5) and Constable Subhash Chand apprehended the person. HC Kartar Singh (PW-13) and Head Constable Bhagwan Chand picked up the green coloured bag from the bushes and when the bag was opened, in which a pale yellow coloured carry bag was found to be containing a black colour hard substance in the form of slides and rolls. As per experience of the investigating team, the recovered substance was found to be cannabis/charas. The person was interrogated in the presence of motor cycle rider Vijay Kumar (PW-3) and pillion rider Sunil Kumar (PW-2), who disclosed his name as Manish Kumar s/o late Sh. Praveen Kumar, resident of VPO Simani, Tehsil Salooni, Police Station Khairi, Distt. Chamba.

3. The Investigating Officer took out scale from his kit and weighed contraband in the presence of PW-2 and PW-3, which was found to be 1.700 kg. Thereafter, cannabis was put into the same carry bag and sealed in a parcel with three seal impressions of ^^y**. NCB forms in triplicate Ex. PW-11/A was filled in by the Investigating Officer and impression of the seal ^^y** was taken on the NCB forms in triplicate. Sample of the seal was taken on a white cloth Ex. PW-2/A in the presence of PW2 and PW3 and they also appended their signatures thereon. Seal after its use was handed over to PW-3 by the Investigating Officer. Case property was taken into possession vide memo Ex. PW-1/A in the presence of PW-3 Vijay Kumar, PW-2 Sunil Kumar and PW1 HHC Sanjay Kumar.

4. Thereafter, on suspicion, in order to conduct personal search of the the accused, the I.O. asked the accused whether he wanted to give his sea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top