IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, ROMESH VERMA, JJ.
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Manish Kumar – Respondent
Cr. Appeal No. 445 of 2015
Decided On : 05-12-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. chance recovery of 1.700kg charas during naka check. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. state challenges perverse acquittal; defense supports judgment. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 3. limited appellate interference absent perversity in acquittal. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. io details apprehension, weighing, sealing of contraband. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. independent witnesses hostile, deny recovery entirely. (Para 20 , 21 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 6. officials confirm procedural steps and custody chain. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. contradictions, lapses discredit prosecution evidence. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 8. proof must exclude reasonable doubt beyond suspicion. (Para 55 , 56) |
| 9. appeal dismissed; acquittal upheld as plausible. (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
JUDGMENT :
ROMESH VERMA, J.
1. The present appeal arises out of judgment, as passed by the learned Special Judge-II, Chamba, District Chamba, H.P., in Sessions Trial No. 34/2014, dated 20.1.2015, whereby the accused-respondent has been acquitted of the charge under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the Act) in case FIR No. 66/13, dated 10.12.2013, registered at Police Station, Dalhousie, District Chamba, H.P.
2. The story of the prosecution, as projected, is that on 10.12.2013, vide Rapat No.11 Ex. PW-6/A HC Kartar Singh alongwith HC Bhagwan Chand, HC Inder Singh (PW-5), HHC Sanjay Kumar (PW-1), Constable Subhash Chand, Constable Surinder Singh (PW-4) proceeded in the vehicle No. HP-73-0918 being driven by Constable Hem Raj towards Goli, Devi Dehra, Gadhiyar side in connection with Nakabandi and traffic checking duty and they accordingly, laid a nakka at about 3.35 P.M. near Chohda Dam road Dhared. When the police party was checking the vehicles, then at about 3.55 P.M. two persons sitting on motor cycle No. HP47-4360 PULSAR came from the Dam side and their motorcycle was intercepted by the police party. When HC Kartar Singh (PW-13) started checking the documents of the motor cycle, then all of a sudden, one person holding a rucksack (Pithu bag) on his shoulder appeared from the bushes. After seeing the police, the said person got perplexed and threw his bag in the bushes at a distance of ten meters and started running towards Dam side. HC Inder Singh (PW-5) and Constable Subhash Chand apprehended the person. HC Kartar Singh (PW-13) and Head Constable Bhagwan Chand picked up the green coloured bag from the bushes and when the bag was opened, in which a pale yellow coloured carry bag was found to be containing a black colour hard substance in the form of slides and rolls. As per experience of the investigating team, the recovered substance was found to be cannabis/charas. The person was interrogated in the presence of motor cycle rider Vijay Kumar (PW-3) and pillion rider Sunil Kumar (PW-2), who disclosed his name as Manish Kumar s/o late Sh. Praveen Kumar, resident of VPO Simani, Tehsil Salooni, Police Station Khairi, Distt. Chamba.
3. The Investigating Officer took out scale from his kit and weighed contraband in the presence of PW-2 and PW-3, which was found to be 1.700 kg. Thereafter, cannabis was put into the same carry bag and sealed in a parcel with three seal impressions of ^^y**. NCB forms in triplicate Ex. PW-11/A was filled in by the Investigating Officer and impression of the seal ^^y** was taken on the NCB forms in triplicate. Sample of the seal was taken on a white cloth Ex. PW-2/A in the presence of PW2 and PW3 and they also appended their signatures thereon. Seal after its use was handed over to PW-3 by the Investigating Officer. Case property was taken into possession vide memo Ex. PW-1/A in the presence of PW-3 Vijay Kumar, PW-2 Sunil Kumar and PW1 HHC Sanjay Kumar.
4. Thereafter, on suspicion, in order to conduct personal search of the the accused, the I.O. asked the accused whether he wanted to give his sea
Acquittal under NDPS Section 20 upheld in appeal; no interference absent perversity where independent witnesses turn hostile denying recovery and contradictions undermine prosecution evidence.
Appeal against NDPS acquittal dismissed upholding trial court due to contradictions in official testimonies, document/FIR anomalies, weight discrepancies creating reasonable doubt; appellate interfer....
Appellate interference in acquittal limited to perverse findings or sole guilt view; upheld where contradictions, non-examination of independent witnesses, and custody lapses render prosecution case ....
Appeal against acquittal under NDPS Act: Interference only if trial court's view perverse or impossible; here, witness inconsistencies, procedural lapses justify upholding acquittal.
Appeal against acquittal under NDPS Act dismissed due to prosecution lapses including no independent witnesses, material contradictions in evidence, sample weight variations, and chain of custody gap....
Appeal against acquittal under NDPS Act dismissed; trial court's view upheld as not perverse due to witness contradictions, procedural lapses like unrecorded prior information, no independent witness....
Acquittal under NDPS Act upheld in appeal due to Section 50 non-compliance (invalid third option, improper waiver), witness inconsistencies, lack of independent witnesses on busy highway, and plausib....
Material contradictions in key witness testimonies on contraband possession vitiate NDPS prosecution case, entitling accused to acquittal on benefit of doubt despite recovery.
In NDPS acquittal appeals, courts interfere only if perverse; discrepancies in police evidence, non-association of available independent witnesses, seal issues, and custody gaps justify upholding acq....
Material contradictions in prosecution witnesses, non-examination of material witness, hostile independent witness, and procedural inconsistencies entitle accused to benefit of doubt resulting in acq....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.