SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(J&K) 550

MUZAFFAR HUSSAIN ATTAR
Bashir Ahmed Malik – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.I. Qadiri, Petitioner in person.

1. Petitioner at the age of about 70 years is craving for getting benefits which are not being extended to him by the State Government, though, allowed in his favour, in a duly constituted judicial proceedings by this Court vide its judgment dated 3rd of Nov. 2006 rendered in SWP No. 1547/2000. Why the petitioner is again before the Court, needs to be briefly summarized.

2. Petitioner was member of service in J&K Industries Ltd. Process was initiated by the State of J&K for considering suitable and meritorious persons of different services for being promoted/appointed to the Time Scale of J&K Administrative Service (KAS) which service is constituted in terms of the Jammu and Kashmir Administrative Service Rules, 1979 (for short Rules of 1979). The Rule 5 (c) of Rules of 1979 before its amendment which was made vide SRO 472 of 2001 dated 20th Dec. 2001 provided for appointment of members of Autonomous Bodies/Government owned Public Sector Undertakings by way of selection to the Time Scale of Kashmir Administrative Service (for short KAS). The Rule 5 (c) of Rules of 1979 as it existed before the aforementioned amendment being relevant is reproduced as under:-

"By selection to the time










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top