SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 697

Girdhari Lal – Appellant
Versus
Ram Lal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. S.D. Sharma
For the Respondent: Mr. P.N. Raina, Mr. J.A. Hamal, Ms. Garima Gupta

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal was admitted to hearing on 21.08.2003 on the following substantial question of law:-

“Whether a co-owner can seek an injunction, restraining the other co-owner from using a joint property or raising construction thereon without seeking relief of partition?”

2. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length on the aforesaid question of law. Before I proceed to deal with the rival contentions, it would be appropriate to refer to the factual matrix in the context of which, this Civil Second Appeal has arisen.

3. The appellant herein was defendant in the trial Court. The respondent herein was the plaintiff who had filed the suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, who is appellant herein. To avoid confusion, the parties are hereinafter referred to as “the plaintiff” and “the defendant”. The suit filed by the plaintiff against the defendant was for seeking a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction; with a further relief of mandatory injunction on the ground that the plaintiff and the defendant were joint owners in possession of the land measuring 4 kanals 10 marlas comprised in Khasra No.703 situated in village Dhanori, Tehsil Udh




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top