SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 160

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Vivek Singh Thakur, J
Dharam Singh – Appellant
Versus
Lekh Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. G.R. Palsra.
For the Respondent: Mr. Devender K. Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Singh Thakur, J.

Appellants are defendants in present matter, whereas, respondent is plaintiff, in Civil Suit No.70 of 2015, titled as Lekh Ram vs. Dharam Singh & others, in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No.4, Mandi, H.P., filed for permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against the defendants on the ground that the suit land is in joint ownership and possession of the plaintiff, defendants and other co-sharers and property has not been partitioned, but defendants without getting the land partitioned have started raising construction on the valuable portion of the suit land on 15.02.2015 by occupying valuable portion forcibly for their personal use without consent and permission of the plaintiff and other co-sharers and construction raised as such shall cause irreparable loss and injury to the plaintiff and other co-sharers which cannot be compensated otherwise.

2. Defendants contested the suit by filing written statement stating therein that suit land, though, is in joint ownership and possession of the parties, but parties are residing separately in their houses and cultivating and possessing the land separately from each other by raising

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top