SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(J&K) 16

Abu Hussain – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Abdullah – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. M.A. Qayoom, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. R.A. Jan, Sr. Advocated, with Mr. Taha Khalil, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. By this order, preliminary objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 with regard to the maintainability of this appeal is proposed to be determined.

2. Before coming to the preliminary objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1, let me give a brief background of the facts leading to filing of this appeal.

3. It appears that the respondent No.1 had filed a suit against the appellant and respondents 2 and 3 before the Court of Principal District Judge, Kargil. Through the medium of said suit, the plaintiff had sought a declaration that he is owner of land measuring 1½ kanals situated at Khurbathang Kargil, which he had purchased from the appellant and respondent No.3, who happened to be the proforma defendants No. 2 and 3 to the suit. A permanent injunction restraining the defendants from proceeding with the construction of house on the aforesaid land with a mandatory injunction directing the defendants to remove the material from the suit land was also sought

4. It appears that the suit was decreed in exparte in favour of the plaintiff i.e. the respondent No.1 herein, by virtue of an exparte judgment and decree dated 13.12.2019. A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top