SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(J&K) 452

ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY, VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
Services Selection Recruitment Board – Appellant
Versus
Naseer Ahmad Tarray – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
LPASW No.35/2019 [LPA No.62/2019]:
For the Appellant(s): M/s. Mir Suhail, AAG and Sajjad Ashraf Mir, GA
For the Respondent(s):Mr. Z.A. Shah, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Hanan, Advocate; and Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Advocate
LPA No.117/2019:
For the Appellant(s): M/s. Mir Suhail, AAG and Sajjad Ashraf Mir, GA
For the Respondent(s):Mr. Z.A. Shah, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Hanan, Advocate
LPA No.237/2019:
For the Appellant(s): M/s. Mir Suhail, AAG and Sajjad Ashraf Mir, GA
For the Respondent(s):Ms. Saima Mehboob, Advocate
SWP No.414/2019, SWP No.1545/2018 and CPSW No.624/2018:
For the Appellant(s):Mr. Z.A. Shah, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Hanan, Advocate
For the Respondent(s): M/s. Mir Suhail, AAG and Sajjad Ashraf Mir, GA
SWP No.415/2019 and SWP No.1495/2018:
For the Appellant(s):Mr. Z.A. Shah, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Hanan, Advocate
For the Respondent(s):M/s. Mir Suhail, AAG and Sajad Ashraf Mir, GA; and Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Advocate
SWP No.831/2019:
For the Appellant(s):Mr. Gulzar Ahmad Bhat Sopori, Advocate
For the Respondent(s):M/s. Mir Suhail, AAG and Sajjad Ashraf Mir, GA; and Mr. Shafqat Nazir, Advocate
SWP No.1463/2018:
For the Appellant(s):Ms. Arifa Jan, Advocate
For the Respondent(s): M/s. Mir Suhail, AAG and Sajjad Ashraf Mir, GA
SWP No.1477/2018 and SWP No.466/2019:
For the Appellant(s):Mr. Z.A. Shah, Senior Advocate with Mr. A. Hanan, Advocate
For the Respondent(s):M/s. Mir Suhail, AAG and Sajad Ashraf Mir, GA; and Mr. Hilal Ahmad Wani, Advocate
SWP No.1907/2018, SWP No.2453/2018, SWP No.1442/2018 and CPSW No.695/2018:
For the Appellant(s): None
For the Respondent(s): M/s. Mir Suhail, AAG and Sajad Ashraf Mir, GA

Judgment :

Ali Mohammad Magrey, J.

1. In the three appeals, being LPASW No. 35/2019; LPA No.117/2019; and LPA No.237/2019, the decisions of the learned Single Judge are under challenge, whereby the appellants/ respondents in the Writ petitions have been directed to call the Writ petitioners/ respondents herein for counselling, verify their documents and assess their grade by awarding weightage of higher qualification denied to them on account of having omitted to fill-up the requisite column in their online application forms. Besides, certain Writ petitions were also noticed to be pending before the Writ Court involving the same question of fact and the law qua denial of award of marks to higher qualification(s) on the ground of same having been omitted in the online application forms, which petitions, on the consensus of the learned counsel for the parties, stand clubbed herewith these appeals for their decision together. Moreover, in certain Writ petitions the consideration orders issued by the respondents therein (Board) pursuant to the directions of the learned Sing

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top