IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR
Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Rajnesh Oswal, JJ.
Mohammad Maqbool Lone – Appellant
Versus
Intelligence Officer Narcotics - Respondent
CRA No.01/2015 c/w Bail App No.101/2019
Decided on : 04-06-2021
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985-Section 8(c) read with Sections 20(b)(ii)(c)-Seizure of Charas-Accused is not entitled to acquittal merely because complainant and Investigating officer are same and due to it, trial is vitiated-Each case is to be determined as per its own facts and circumstances-If accused is able to demonstrate that Investigating Officer who happens to be complainant himself and has acted with bias or conducted unfair investigation causing prejudice to accused, then certainly accused is entitled to acquittal-Similar would be the case when investigation is conducted in an unauthorized manner. (Para 11)
Result-Appeal allowed.
Judgment
Rajnesh Oswal, J.-The appellant, after having been convicted by court of learned Sessions Judge Kathua (hereinafter to be referred as trial court) for commission of offence under section 8(c) of the NDPS Act read with sections 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act (for short the Act) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 20 years and payment of fine of Rs. 2 lacs, has challenged the judgment dated 08.01.2015 (hereinafter to be referred as the judgment impugned) and order dated 10.01.2015 through the medium of present appeal on the various grounds legal as well as factual, as narrated in the memo of appeal.
Case of prosecution:
2. Briefly stated, the complaint was filed against the appellant for commission of offences under sections 8, 20 and 60 of the Act in which it was stated that the secret information was received from the source that Drug Trafficking from Kashmir Valley to Delhi in Truck No. JK05-6906 dated 13.03.2013 is going on and the supply of drug may be in Transport Nagar, Delhi. The above said information was given in writing by Shri Maneet Kumar, Intelligence Officer (IO) to the Superintendent NCB Jammu i.e., Ms. Mehak Jain, who constituted the team under her supervision and Naka was laid on 13.03.2013 at night along with police on Lakhanpur road, opposite to Lakhanpur Police Station. At around 22:45hrs on 13.03.2013 two persons, namely, Shri Ajay Sharma and Shri Darshan Singh were crossing that area. Shri Maneet Kumar Intelligence Officer requested them to accompany the NCB team to the place of naka to witness the whole procedure of seizure, if any. At about 23.15hrs Shri Maneet Kumar Intelligence Officer stopped Truck No. JK05-6906 which was coming from Jammu.. Sh. Maneet Kumar, IO introduced himself and rest of the NCB team members to driver and asked him for his introduction. He introduced himself as Mohd. Maqbool Lone. Shri Maneet Kumar intimated him their purpose of searching the vehicle. Before search notice under section 50 of the Act was given to the driver by Shri Maneet Kumar but he declined search before Magistrate and Gazetted Officer and in reply stated that “He does not require any gazetted Officer or Magistrate, He can take his search”. Then Shri Maneet Kumar instructed his sepoy Shri Naveen Kumar to search the vehicle. Then the sepoy started searching the vehicle in presence of above said witnesses. While searching Shri Naveen Kumar saw Apple box carrying packets. After that Shri Naveen Kumar pulled out that Apple Box. Shri Maneet Kumar asked Mohd. Maqbool Lone to take out all the packets from the Apple Box. The packets were taken out of the Apple Box by Mohd. Maqbool Lone in the vehicle itself and counted, 08 packets were found. All the 08 packets were wrapped with Brown coloured packing tape. After removing the tape, it was found to have been covered by newspaper. On removing the News Paper, the transparent polythene containing total no. of 32 small black coloured balls, was found. Then Shri Maneet Kumar extracted a small quantity of material from the black colored balls, mixed them thoroughly and tested with the DD KIT and found the result positive for Charas. Then Shri Maneet Kumar weighed all the 32 black coloured Balls with the weighing machine and found the weight of all the Black coloured balls as 14.978 kgs. Shri Maneet Kumar prepared the recovery cum seizure memo on the spot and was signed by the accused and the witnesses. All the black coloured balls were mixed together and two samples of 24 grams each were taken. These samples were put into 2 plastic transparent envelopes and were heat sealed. Then the same were packed into two white paper envelopes. A white paper slip was pasted at the opening place of these envelopes so that they could not be opened without tearing. These samples were marked as S-1 and S-2. The remaining charas i.e. 14.930 Kgs was put into a big transparent polythene and was heat sealed. After heat sealing, it was put into a white marking cloth bag and w
Mukesh Singh vs. State (NCT of Delhi)
H. N. Rishbud vs. State of Delhi
The court established that the physical production of the contraband and sealed samples, the admissibility of the test analysis report, and the fairness of the investigation conducted by the informan....
The absence of independent witnesses does not invalidate the prosecution's case if police testimonies are credible, and Section 50 of the NDPS Act is not applicable when recovery is from a bag.
Failures and inconsistencies in the prosecution's case, including unexplained delay in informing the police, contradictions in the evidence of prosecution's witnesses, and failure to produce the seiz....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.