SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Guj) 747

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK, J.
Narendrabhai Dhirajlal Kacha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2328 of 2019 With CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE) NO. 1 of 2019 With R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2349 of 2019 With CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FIXING DATE OF EARLY HEARING) NO. 1 of 2023, CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (REGULAR BAIL) NO. 2 of 2022, R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2298 of 2019
Decided on : 08-09-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : MR KARTIK V PANDYA, MR MB GOHIL
For the Respondent: MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 25-A, 29 and 50 - Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 374(2) - Conviction for possession of controlled substances - Appellants convicted for ten years of rigorous imprisonment - The court emphasized due procedural compliance under the Act in the arrest and search processes, particularly highlighting that entries were made as per requirements but noted gaps in witness testimonies and evidence linking the accused to illegal activities. (Paras 10, 18, 20 and 24)

(B) The main issues revolved around the adequacy of evidence linking accused to illegal drug activities and the procedural compliance under Sections 42, 50, and 57 of the Act. Courts rule against mere suspicion, emphasizing that prosecutions under the NDPS Act must prove solid connections to illicit acts. (Paras 21, 22 and 23)

(C)

Findings of Court:
The court found the prosecution's evidence sufficient to affirm convictions despite some hostile witnesses, stressing compliance with statutory provisions and the presumption of guilt under Section 54 of the NDPS Act based on possession of narcotic substances. (Paras 24, 26, and 27)

Result: Appeals dismissed; convictions upheld.

Table of Content
1. conviction under ndps act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. evidence of search and seizure. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments on behalf of the appellants. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. prosecution's burden to prove conspiracy. (Para 14 , 15)
5. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
6. importance of corroborative evidence. (Para 24 , 25 , 26)
7. final verdict and conclusion. (Para 27)

JUDGMENT :

1. The appellants - accused have preferred these appeals under Section 374(2) of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , 1973 against the judgment and order of conviction dated 07.10.2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural), Mirzapur at Ahmedabad (hereinafter be referred to as “the Trial Court”) in NDPS Case Nos. 4 of 2016, 6 of 2016 and 2 of 2017, whereby present appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 25 -A and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter be referred to as “the Act”) and directed them to undergo sentence of rigorous imprisonment of ten years for the said offences with fine of Rs.1,00,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.

2. Present group of appeals is arising out of the common question of law and facts. In substance, learned advocates appearing for the respective parties have requested to deal with and decide the same conjointly and as such, considering the request and the joint submission, the Court has taken up the appeals for hearing by treating Criminal Appeal No.2328 of 2019 as a lead matter and for the sake of convenience, the facts are taken from the said appeal. So far as the lead matter, i.e. Criminal Appeal No.2328 of 2019, is concerned, same is arising from the following background of facts:-

2.1 On 14.04.2016 the first informant, Mr. V. R. Malhotra, Police Inspector, serving in the A.T.S., Gujarat State, Ahmedabad was orally instructed by Superintendent of Police (Operations), A.T.S. that Mr. B. C. Solanki, A.C.P., S.O.G., Ahmedabad City has received a secret information to the effect that the accused Narendra Dhirajlal Kacha in conspiracy and in connivance with accused Kishore Bhavsinh Rathod and Jay @ Jay Mukhi had procured an illegal consignment of Ephedrine from factory situated at Solapur, Maharashtra and had kept it in his possession in industrial shed of Jayesh Patel situated near the connecting road to Village Vahelal, Taluka Daskroi, District Ahmedabad. It was further alleged that all these accused are preparing to export the said Ephedrine to foreign country and the informant was further instructed to arrange a raid in pursuance of secret information. Accordingly, a team of ATS Officers was formed which included the first informant Mr. V. R. Malhotra, Mr. B. C. Solanki, A.C.P., S.O.G., ATS; Mr. R. R. Sarvaiya, Police Inspector, Crime Branch and other staff members including a photographer. It was alleged that two independent witnesses for being panch were also arranged by P.S.I. Mr. R. K. Solanki; the panchas were briefed about the raid and once they gave their consent for accompanying them and after taking necessary articles, the entire team proceeded at the place mentioned in the secret information. Before proceeding, an entry was made in the Station Diary as Entry No. 04/2016, dated 14.04.2016, at 14.50 hours. The team raided the said shed at around 15.45 hours where one person sitting on the chair namely Narendra Dhirajlal Kacha and two persons were working in the shed who stated to be doing labour work under Narendra Kacha and, thereafter, the members of the ATS team entered into the shed and gave their identity to those persons. Thereafter, Mr. V. R. Malhotra, being in-charge of the raiding party told the accused - Narendrabhai Kacha that he was having an information that a big consignment of controlled substance Ephedrine kept under this shed and for that reason a search of the p

                      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                      1
                      2
                      3
                      4
                      5
                      6
                      7
                      8
                      9
                      10
                      11
                      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                      supreme today icon
                      logo-black

                      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                      Please visit our Training & Support
                      Center or Contact Us for assistance

                      qr

                      Scan Me!

                      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                      whatsapp-icon Back to top