SANJAY DHAR
Showkat Ahmad Nadaf – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay Dhar, J. – The petitioner has filed the instant criminal revision petition against order dated 11.08.2018 passed by learned Principal Sessions Judge, Srinagar (hereinafter referred to as the appellate court), whereby the learned Sessions Judge has upheld the judgment of conviction/sentence passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class (2nd Additional Munsiff), Srinagar (hereinafter referred to as the trial court), on 20.08.2013, whereby the petitioner has been convicted for offences under Section 279, 304-A RPC and sentenced to imprisonment for a period of one year and a fine of Rs.2000/- in proof of offence under Section 304-A RPC and for a period of two months and a fine of Rs.500/- in proof of offence under Section 279 RPC.
2. The record of the case reveals that on 12.05.2001, the petitioner was driving a Maruti car bearing No.DDU-6258. A minor girl, namely, Rubeena, was knocked down by the said vehicle, as a result of which she received fatal injuries leading to her death. FIR No.85/2001 for offences under Section 279, 304- RPC was registered and the investigation of the case was set into motion. After completing investigation of the case, the charge she
Kashiram and others v. State of M.P
Dehal Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Sanatan Naskar & anr. v. State of West Bengal
: Answers given by accused when incriminating circumstances appearing in prosecution evidence are put to him and his statement under Section 342 of J&K Cr.P.C. is recorded, are required to be conside....
Conviction for negligent driving requires substantial evidence beyond mere speed; a driver cannot be held liable under IPC without evidence proving rashness and negligence distinctly.
The absence of key eyewitness testimony undermines the prosecution's case on charges of rash and negligent driving, necessitating acquittal.
The prosecution in criminal cases bears the burden of proving the charges beyond reasonable doubt, and the principle of 'res ipsa loquitur' can only be used as a permissive inference, requiring firml....
Negligence and rashness must be proven beyond reasonable doubt for conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC; mere involvement in an accident does not equate to guilt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.