IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Rajnesh Oswal, J.
Sushil Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
Union Territory of J&K & Anr. – Respondents
Bail App No. 200 of 2021 & CrlM No. 1254 of 2021
Decided On : 29-09-2021
BAIL - Criminal Law - Sections 370-A and 376 RPC - The court discussed the provisions of section 497-C of the J and K Cr.P.C, which prohibits the grant of bail if there are reasonable grounds that the accusations against the accused are true. The court emphasized that the evidence brought on record after the commencement of trial should be considered, and the presumption of innocence is in favor of the accused till he is held guilty. The court granted bail to the petitioner based on the length of custody and the recorded statement of the prosecutrix.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a bail application after the trial court framed charges against him under sections 370-A and 376 RPC. The prosecutrix had accused multiple individuals of rape and being pushed into a sex racket, and the petitioner argued that she had not deposed anything against him. The court considered the length of custody and the recorded statement of the prosecutrix in granting bail to the petitioner.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the evidence brought on record after the commencement of trial should be considered, and the presumption of innocence is in favor of the accused till he is held guilty. Based on the length of custody and the recorded statement of the prosecutrix, the court deemed it proper to grant bail to the petitioner.
Issues: The issues revolved around the grant of bail to the petitioner, considering the accusations against him and the length of his custody.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the evidence brought on record after the commencement of trial should be considered, and the presumption of innocence is in favor of the accused till he is held guilty. These factors influenced the court's decision to grant bail to the petitioner.
Final Decision: The application was allowed, and the petitioner was enlarged on bail under specific conditions.
JUDGMENT :
1. The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner, who is facing trial before the court of Principal Sessions Judge, Rajouri (hereinafter to be referred as the trial court) in challan, titled, “Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Jaspal and others” arising out of FIR bearing No. 150/2018 registered with Police Station, Nowshera under sections 370-A and 376 RPC.
2. It is stated that after filing of the challan, the learned trial court framed the charges under sections 370-A and 376 RPC vide order dated 27.12.2019 against the petitioner. After the statement of the prosecutrix was recorded, the petitioner filed the bail application before the learned trial court on the ground that the statement of the prosecutrix has been recorded and she has not deposed anything against the petitioner but the learned trial court dismissed the said application vide order dated 03.07.2021 and thereafter, the present bail application has been filed by the petitioner.
3. It is stated that the prosecutrix has not deposed anything against the petitioner and now only the formal witnesses are to be examined. The conclusion of the trial court may take considerable time and the petitioner despite being innocent is in custody. It is further stated that evidence can be looked into for limited purpose so as to ascertain whether the prosecutrix has deposed anything against the accused or not. It is further stated that the petitioner has been in custody for the last more than two years and as such, he deserves to be enlarged on bail. The petitioner has placed on record certified copy of the statement of the prosecutrix.
4. Response stands filed by the respondents, in which it has been stated that on 28.07.2018, the prosecutrix lodged a written report at Police Station, Nowshera to the effect that she is a poor girl, her parents had already expired and she is living with her two brothers who are putting up at Panj Peer Rajouri in a rented accommodation. About one year back when she visited a shop at Bus Stand Rajouri for getting her mobile phone recharged, an unknown boy noted her contact number. Thereafter, the above said boy used to repeatedly call her on phone and compelled her to come at Nowshera on the pretext that he would provide her some good job in Nowshera town, by disclosing his name as Happy. Subsequently, said boy trapped her in his net and called her at Nowshera bridge, took her towards Rajal/Garan in bushes and committed rape with her and threatened her not to disclose the matter to anyone otherwise she would face dire consequences. Thereafter the said Amritpal Singh @ Happy S/o Bikram Singh again called her at Nowshera and committed gang rape upon her with the connivance of Karamjeet Singh S/o Narinder Singh R/o Nonial in a room located in Nowshera town. Thereafter, the above said Karamjeet Singh contacted some more people of the locality including Bachan Singh, Dara Singh, Jaspal Singh and Karampaul Singh, Mohinder Singh, Jagandeep Singh, Pargat and Vicky Kumar and Sushil Kumar and all the persons mentioned hereinabove had committed rape/gang rape with her by taking her at different locations and some of them used her in earning illegal money by further supplying her to other persons. The above mentioned persons pushed the said girl into a sex racket by taking advantage of her poverty and being minor. On this the aforesaid FIR was registered and the investigation was initiated.
5. It is also stated that during the course of investigation the then Additional Superintendent of Police Nowshera completed all legal formalities and thereafter the challan was produced in the court of law on 22.10.2018 against Jaspal Singh, Karamjeet Singh, Bachan Singh, under sections 370-A and 376 RPC who were arrested in the case. Accused namely Jagandeep Singh, Mohinder Singh were absconding and the proceedings under section 512 CrPC were initiated against both the accused persons by the court of JMIC Nowshera. Total 05 accused persons wer
The presumption of innocence is in favor of the accused till he is held guilty, and the evidence brought on record after the commencement of trial should be considered in bail applications.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of evaluating the evidentiary value of the prosecutrix's statement for the purpose of granting bail, and the court's authority to ta....
Grant of bail based on similarity of the case with a previously granted bail to a co-accused and without commenting on the merits of the case.
The delay in filing the FIR and the conduct of the complainant can raise doubts about the credibility of the allegations in cases of sexual offenses.
The significance of delay in filing the FIR, lack of supporting evidence, and voluntary actions of the complainant and the accused and his family are crucial factors in considering bail applications ....
The presumption of innocence until proven guilty and the need to avoid imposing pre-trial punishment on the accused are central legal principles established in the judgment.
The court held that a conviction for rape is unsafe solely on the testimony of the prosecutrix when there is significant delay in reporting and lack of corroborative evidence.
The presumption of innocence, the sufficiency of evidence, and the purpose of pre-trial incarceration were central to the court's decision in granting bail.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that at the time of considering the grant of bail, there should be no meticulous examination of the statements of the witnesses as it may influence....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.