SANJAY DHAR
Farooq Ahmad Magray – Appellant
Versus
UT of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANJAY DHAR, J.
1. Petitioner is aggrieved of order dated 07.09.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sopore, to the extent it directs the petitioner to furnish bank guarantee to the tune of Rs. 1.00 lac as a condition precedent for release of the vehicle bearing No. JK-03C-6054 in his favour.
2. It has been contended by the petitioner that the condition imposed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for release of the vehicle in question in his favour is onerous which the petitioner is unable to fulfill, as a result of which he is being deprived of the possession of the vehicle of which he happens to be the registered owner. According to the petitioner, by imposing such an onerous condition, the petitioner has been denied possession of the vehicle, as a result of which it has been made to deteriorate in the premises of the police station without there being any confiscation proceedings pending in respect of the vehicle in question.
3. Reply on behalf of the respondent-State has been filed in which the respondent has narrated the facts leading to seizure of the vehicle bearing No. JK-03C-6054. As per the respondent, the aforesaid vehicle was seized in connectio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.