JUDGMENT :

1. Issue notice.

2. Mr. G.S. Thakur, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 6.

3. The grievance of the petitioners-plaintiffs in the present petition is that though the plaintiffs are in possession of the suit property yet the trial court had passed the order of status quo with regard to the suit property and on appeal filed by the respondents-defendants in the suit set aside the order of the Tribunal. The revenue entries were in favour of the plaintiffs for a long time before the same illegally came to be changed in favour of the defendants. The report of the Patwari and authenticated by Tehsildar and further the photographs on the file do make out the possession of the plaintiffs in the suit property. The petitioners are particularly aggrieved of the order passed by the appellate court on the ground that the order itself is contradictory and not as per the record.

4. Mr. Sanjay Kakkar, Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners has argued on the aforesaid lines.

5. Mr. G.S. Thakur, Advocate appearing for the private respondents-defendants has argued that the writ is not maintainable. The possession of the respondents is manifest through the documents