SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 445

SANJAY DHAR
Tasleema Begum – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu And Kashmir – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mir Umar, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Dhar, J. - The petitioner has challenged part of investigation conducted by 2nd Investigating Officer in FIR No.76/2022 for offences under Sections 498 A, 307, 354 and 34 IPC registered with Women's Police Station Kupwara. Challenge has also been thrown to the status report dated 02.10.2022 filed by the Investigating Officer before the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Kralpora, wherein it has been reported by the Investigating Officer that offences have not been established against some of the accused.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that initially the investigation of the case was conducted by Sh. Abdul Sattar but later on it was entrusted to a probationary Police Officer of the rank of Dy.SP. It is alleged that the said Investigating Officer did not conduct the investigation in fair and transparent manner and when the petitioner came to know about it, she approached the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Kralpora and filed application under Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C requesting the learned Magistrate to monitor the investigation of the case. It has been further submitted that on the said application the learned Magistrate called status report

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top