VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, RAJENDRA KUMAR IV
Preeti Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Ram Pratap Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State respondents.
2. Present petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
(vi) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Superintendent of Police Jaunpur to withdraw the investigation from the Crime Branch in regard to the Crime referred to above so that investigation of the Crime may not be diluted in any manner and real culprits may be booked who are accountable for the commission of the Crime, in the better interest of justice."
3. Initially, the FIR in question was filed by the petitioner herself, however, during investigation by the Crime Branch she was implicated as an accused, ther
Babubhai vs. State of Gujarat and others
C.B.I. and another vs. Rajesh Gandhi and another 1996 (11) SCC 253
Eicher Tractors Ltd., Haryana Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Jamuna Chaudhary & Ors. Vs. State of Bihar AIR 1974 SC 1822
K. Chandrasekhar Vs. State of Kerala & Ors. (1998) 5 SCC 223
Kailash Chandra Vs. Union of India AIR 1961 SC 1346
Kashmeri Devi Vs. Delhi Administration & Anr. AIR 1988 SC 1323
Kishan Lal Vs. Dharmendra Bafna (2009) 7 SCC 685
Mahmood Vs. State of U.P. AIR 1976 SC 69
Manu Sharma Vs. State (NCT of Delhi) (2010) 6 SCC 1
Mithabhai Pashabhai Patel & Ors. Vs. State of Gujarat (2009) 6 SCC 332
Navinchandra N. Majithia Vs. State of Meghalaya & Ors. AIR 2000 SC 3275
R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab
Ramachandran Vs. R. Udhayakumar & Ors. (2008) 5 SCC 413
S.N. Sharma Vs. Bipen Kumar Tiwari & Ors. AIR 1970 SC 786
State of A.P. Vs. Sarma Rao & Ors. AIR 2007 SC 137
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.