SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 465

SANJAY DHAR
Nazir Ahmad Lone – Appellant
Versus
B. R. Sharma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
R.A.Bhat, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Dhar, J. - Through the medium of instant petition, the petitioners have complained about the violation of order dated 11.09.2013 passed by this Court in IA No.2295/2013 in SWP No.487/2013, whereby, respondents were directed to consider the claim of the applicants/petitioners strictly as per the rules occupying the field.

2. Statement of facts on behalf of respondents stands filed.

3. Since the main writ petition stands transferred to Central Administrative Tribunal vide order dated 14.12.2022 and a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case titled Abdul Qayoom Guroo vs. Ajeet Kumar Sahoo and Others, CCP(S) No.144/2020, decided on 29.09.2021, has, while considering the question as to whether Central Administrative Tribunal constituted under Section 4 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 ['the Act'] has power and authority under Section 17 of the Act to punish for contempt in relation to an interim order passed by the High Court in a writ petition, which was subsequently transferred to it under Section 29 of the Act, held that contempt proceedings in relation to orders passed by this Court in the petitions, which subsequently stand transferred to the Tribunal under Sect

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top