VIVEK KUMAR BIRLA, VIKAS BUDHWAR
Pankaj Dhar Dubey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Bashist Tiwari, learned counsel assisted by Sri Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vivek Kumar Singh, who has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent no. 1-Union of India.
2. In view of the order which is being proposed to be passed today there is no need to issue notice to the respondent nos. 2 to 5.
3. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India instituted by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:
(ii) To issue writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to give promotion to the petitioner on the post of Lab Assista
T. Sudhakar Prasad vs. Government of A.P. and Others
V.K. Majotra vs. Union of India and Others
Santosh Kumar Srivastava vs. The Managing Director, U.P. Rajiya Nirman Nigam Ltd. and Others
Supreme Court Bar Association vs. Union of India
L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India
Kapildeo Prasad Sah and Others vs. State of Bihar
Jhareswar Prasad Paul and Another vs. Tarak Nath Ganguly and Others
Education, Uttaranchal and Others vs. Ved Prakash Joshi and Others
Dushyant Somal vs. Sushma Somal
Delhi Judicial Service Association, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Baradakanta Mishra vs. Justice Gatikrushna Misra, C.J. of the Orissa High Court
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.