SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(J&K) 93

RAJNESH OSWAL, PUNEET GUPTA
State of J. & K. – Appellant
Versus
Surinder Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Amit Gupta.
For the Respondent: Rajnish Raina, Surinder Kumar.

JUDGMENT :

1. The present acquittal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.01.2016 passed by the court of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Samba (hereinafter to be referred as the trial court) in case titled "State of J&K v. Surinder Kumar" whereby the respondent has been acquitted of the charge for commission of offences under section 363/ 376 RPC in FIR bearing No. 178/2013 registered with Police Station, Samba.

2. The judgment of the acquittal has been assailed by the appellant on the ground that the prosecution had established the case against the respondent by adducing documentary as well as oral evidence, which in the ordinary course was sufficient to convict the respondent but the learned trial court has failed to appreciate the prosecution evidence in its right perspective and acquitted the respondent erroneously.

3. Mr. Amit Gupta, learned AAG argued that the victim/prosecutrix was minor and the learned trial court has failed to appreciate her testimony in right perspective and acquitted the respondent despite the fact that the prosecution had proved the case beyond reasonable doubt.

4. Mr. Rajnish Raina who volunteered to represent the respondent, argued that th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top