JUDGMENT :

1. Through the medium of the instant petition fled under Article 226, the petitioner has thrown challenge to order dated 28th of January 2021 passed by Respondent 1, whereby the revision petition fled by the petitioner against mutation Order No. 423, dated 8th of October 1997, came to be dismissed.

2. The facts under the shade and cover of which the instant petition has been fled, would reveal that the predecessor in interest of the petitioner and the private respondents herein being their father, left behind a landed estate situated at Chandpora, Srinagar.

3. The Tehsildar concerned is stated to have attested the mutation supra in respect of the said landed estate in favour of Private Respondents 2 to 4, excluding the petitioner and two other legal heirs.

4. It is being stated that upon coming to know about the attestation of the said mutation, the petitioner approached the official respondents in the year 2017 and brought into their notice the fact of her exclusion there from and a copy of the communication in this regard is stated to have been addressed by Tehsildar North, Srinagar, dated 21st of August 2017 to the Deputy Commissioner, Srinagar, is placed on record and u