SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(J&K) 122

SANJEEV KUMAR, RAJESH SEKHRI
Jyoti Sambyal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Abhinav Sharma; Abhirash Sharma.
For the Respondent: Raman Sharma; Jasbir Singh Jasrotia.

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal under clause XII of Letters Patent is directed against the judgment dated 25.04.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court ['the Writ Court'] in SWP No. 1813/2015 titled 'Badham Kumar v. State of Jammu and Kashmir whereby the writ petition filed by Respondent No. 6 herein ['the writ petitioner'] has been allowed and the order of appointment issued in favour of the appellant has been quashed with a further direction to consider the writ petitioner for appointment.

2. Briefly stated the facts giving rise to filing of this appeal are that vide Advertisement Notification dated 01.05.2010 issued by the office of Chief Education Officer, Samba, two vacancies of ReT in Primary School Dhayansar falling in Purmandal Zone were notified for selection. The consideration was restricted to the permanent residents of the State residing in the village concerned. Three candidates, who had applied for the vacancies in question, were placed in the tentative list of candidates, to be considered for engagement of ReTs by the Zonal Education Officer, Purmanadal. The candidate at S. No. 1 namely, Renu Salathia was admittedly a resident of village Kartholi Morha Dhayansa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top