SANJEEV KUMAR, JAVED IQBAL WANI
State of J&K – Appellant
Versus
Shalinder Singh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Javed Iqbal, J.
1. The instant criminal acquittal appeal has been filed by the erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir (now the Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir) against the judgment dated 25.02.2012 (hereinafter for short the impugned judgment) passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Udhampur, (hereinafter for short the trial Court) in file No. 05/Sessions in case titled as “State Vs. Shalinder Singh and Ors.” arising out of FIR No. 309/2008 of Police Station Udhampur for offences under Sections 302/120-B/212 RPC, 3/25 & 4/25 Arms Act, acquitting the accused respondents herein facing trial while directing warrants issued against the absconding accused persons to remain in force.
2. Brief Facts
Upon completion of the investigation in FIR No 309/2008 supra the prosecution presented challan for commission of offences under Sections 302, 120-B, 212 RPC and 3/25 and 4/25 of the Arms Act against 10 accused persons before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate Udhampur on 17.03.2009. The Chief Judicial Magistrate Udhampur vide order dated 17.03.2009 committed the said challan for trial to the learned Principal Sessions Judge Udhampur who transferred the same to the learned
E.G. Barsay v. State of Bombay AIR 1961 SC 1762 (2-Judge Bench)
Firozuddin Basheeruddin & Ors. v. State of Kerala
Kehar Singh & Ors. v. State (Delhi Administration)
Major Puran v. The State of Punjab AIR 1953 SC 459 (2 -Judge bench)
M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra (1963) 2 SCR 405
Mohd. Arif v. State (NCT of Delhi)
State (Delhi Admn.) Vs. Gulzarilal
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
Yash Pal Mittal v. State of Punjab (1977) 4 SCC 540 (3-Judge Bench)
In cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and unbreakable chain of events to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
The prosecution must prove its case beyond a shadow of doubt and cannot rely solely on the admissions made by the accused. Thorough investigation and the establishment of crucial links in the chain o....
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and conclusive chain of evidence that excludes all reasonable hypotheses of innocence; mere suspicion is ....
Conviction on circumstantial evidence requires complete unbroken chain linking accused to crime; absence of ballistic report connecting recovered pistol to gunshot, no firing eyewitness, and unreliab....
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must provide a complete and unbroken chain of evidence that conclusively points to the guilt of the accused, failing which the accu....
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and unbroken chain of circumstances that excludes any reasonable doubt of the accused's innocence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.