VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
Rajinder Singh Gill – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that he has instructions not to proceed further with the writ petition bearing SWP No. 705/2003. His statement is taken on record.
2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, SWP No. 705/2003, shall stand dismissed as not pressed.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
SWP No. 366/2007
1. Through the medium of instant petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:-
B. Writ of certiorari for quashing the order of respondent No. 2 bearing No.VIII-6/2005 dated 23.09.2005 again being illegal arbitrary unconstitutional and speaks about the working efficiency of the then respondent No. 2.
C. Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to treat the petitioner on duty by treating the aforesaid orders dated 31.08.2004 & 23.09.2005 as non-est and also grant all the consequential benefits
Or in the alternative
D. Writ of mandamus directing respondents to settle, release and pay pr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.