Back
TASHI RABSTAN, MOHAN LAL
Anil Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
TASHI RABSTAN, J.
1. This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 15.03.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge, whereby the appellant’s Writ Petition being W.P. (Crl) No. 66/2022 titled Anil Sharma vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others seeking quashment of detention order No. PITNDPS 20 of 2022 dated 24.09.2022, issued by Respondent No. 2 the Divisional Commissioner, Jammu (hereinafter to be referred to as the Detaining Authority), was dismissed.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant/writ petitioner has assailed the judgment impugned dated 15.03.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge, inter-alia, on the following grounds:
(b) That the learned Single Judge failed to take note of the fact that bare perusal of the order of detention impugned makes it amply clear that the same has been issue
Preventive detention under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988, is aimed at protecting society from activities likely to deprive people of their ....
Preventive detention is justified when there is a reasonable probability of future criminal activity, and the grounds for such detention must be clear and free from ambiguity.
The main legal point established is the purpose and scope of preventive detention as a measure to protect society from individuals engaged in anti-social activities, emphasizing the limited scope of ....
Preventive detention under the Act is justified based on reasonable suspicion of future offenses, and the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority is not subject to extensive judicial revie....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
