VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
J&K Economic Reconstruction Agency – Appellant
Versus
Tarmac Road and Roof Builders – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This petition is preferred under Section 34 of the J&K Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1997 (for brevity “Act of 1997”) for setting-aside the Award dated 30th November 2020, passed by the Arbitrator in Arbitration Application titled as J&K Economic Reconstruction Company v. M/s Tarmac Road and Roof Builders, to the extent it rejected the claims of petitioner and allowed the claims of respondent-contractor.
2. The grounds of challenge, inter alia, taken by petitioner, are that Arbitrator has held respondent-contractor to be entitled to the claim of price escalation/variation for extension in time of completion beyond completion period of twelve months provided in the contract; that the parties to the contract were strictly governed by the terms and conditions the general conditions of the contact and the particular conditions of the contract; that the said general conditions of contract and/or particular conditions of contract nowhere provide for a price escalation clause in favour of respondent-contractor; that in fact petitioner vehemently pleaded before the Arbitrator that in view of clause 13.8, i.e., adjustments for change in cost, was applicable only if table of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.