SANJAY DHAR
Cadila Health Care Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1) The petitioner has challenged order dated 22.09.2021 passed by J&K Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, whereby order of dismissal dated 30.01.2019 passed by the petitioner against respondent No.2 has been kept in abeyance till the disposal of the main petition.
2) It appears that respondent No.2, who was working as an Area Manager in the Sales and Marketing Department of the petitioner company, has filed a petition before respondent No.1/Tribunal. In his petition, respondent No.2 has sought the following reliefs:
(ii) An order directing the OPS not to harass or change the service conditions or deprive the complainant /petitioner from his employment against the mandate of ID Act, Perks and expenses and allowances and other privileges for which he qualifies.
(iii) An order directing the OPs to release salary and expenses already in arrears with the OPS in favour of petitioner/complainant forthwith.
(iv) An any other order/s hereon as it may deem fit and proper
3)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.