SANJAY DHAR
Ghulam Hassan – Appellant
Versus
Financial Commr – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has challenged order dated 16.04.2018, passed by respondents No.2, and orders dated 10.07.2019, 29.01.2020 and 12.10.2021 passed by respondent No.1. Vide order dated 16.04.2018, respondent No.2 has, after treating the appeal of respondent No.4 against mutation No.390 dated 01.09.1986 as a suo moto revision petition, made a recommendation to respondent No.1 to set aside the said order of mutation. Vide order dated 10.07.2019, respondent No.1 has, after accepting the aforesaid recommendation of respondent No.2, set aside the orders passed on mutation No. 390 of estate Qazipura Tehsil, Chadoora and directed attestation of a fresh mutation after following the procedure laid down in Standing Order 23-A. Vide order dated 19.01.2020, respondent No.1 has corrected its order dated 10.07.2019 by making the said order subject to outcome of suit/application, if any pending before the Munsiff. Vide order dated 12.10.2021, respondent No.1 has, while allowing the appeal of respondent No.4 against mutation order Nos.493 and 494 dated 30.01.1990 under Sections 4 and 8 of the Agrarian Reforms Act, set aside the said mutations.
2. As per the case of the petitioner, he is ad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.