SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(J&K) 11

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, J.
Nikita Manhas and Anr. – Appellants
Versus
UT of J&K and ors. - Respondents
WP(C) No. 61 of 2024, CM No. 118 of 2024
Decided on : 12-01-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Karan Kapoor, Advocate.

Inter-caste marriages are in the national interest and those who threaten or harass such couples must be severely punished.

Headnote:

Marriage - Protection of Life and Liberty - Inter-caste Marriage

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, who have married each other of their own free will and consent, express fear of harassment and false cases by the private respondents through the agency of police.

Finding of the Court:

The court, citing the judgment in Lata Singh v. State of UP and Anr., held that inter-caste marriages are in the national interest and that those who threaten or harass such couples must be severely punished. The court directed the police authorities to ensure the protection of the petitioners' life and liberty in accordance with the mentioned judgment.

Issues: Fear of harassment and false cases by private respondents through the agency of police in the context of an inter-caste marriage.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the legal principle established in the judgment of Lata Singh v. State of UP and Anr., emphasizing the legality and national interest of inter-caste marriages and the need to protect such couples from harassment and threats.

Final Decision: The petition is disposed of with a direction for the official respondents to ensure the protection of the petitioners' life and liberty in accordance with the mentioned judgment.

ORDER :

1. Petitioners are present in person.

2. Petitioner No. 1, namely, Nitika Manhas, states that she has attained the age of majority and has married petitioner No. 2 of her own free will and without any undue threat or coercion.

3. The documents reflecting the marriage of the petitioners are on record. The petitioners have also placed on record the documents, which show that both the petitioners are major.

4. It is stated that despite having married each other with their own free will and consent, the private respondents through the agency of police may try to harass them and get them framed in false cases.

5. In similar circumstances where parties had entered into wedlock of their own free will and volition, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Lata Singh v. State of UP and Anr., AIR 2006 SC 2522 has held as under:-

“14. This case reveals a shocking state of affairs. There is no dispute that the petitioner is a major and was at all relevant times a major. Hence she is free to marry anyone she likes or live with anyone she likes. There is no bar to an inter-caste marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act or any other law. Hence, we cannot see what offence was committed by the petitioner, her husband or her husband’s relatives…………………………………….……………………… 17. The caste system is a curse on the nation and the sooner it is destroyed the better. In fact, it is dividing the nation at a time when we have to be united to face the challenges before the nation unitedly. Hence, inter-caste marriages are in fact in the national interest as they will result in destroying the caste system. However, disturbing news are coming from several parts of the country that young men and women who undergo inter-caste marriage, are threatened with violence, or violence is actually committed on them. In our opinion, such acts of violence or threats or harassment are wholly illegal and those who commit them must be severely punished. This is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes. If the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter caste or inter religious marriage the maximum they can do is that they can cut off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter caste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities throughout the country will see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple are not harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence, any one who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law.”

6. In view of the above, this petition is, accordingly, disposed of at this stage, with a direction that the official respondent Nos. 3 and 4 shall ensure the protection of life and liberty of the petitioners and shall take appropriate steps strictly in accordance with the ratio of the judgment (supra).

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top