SANJAY KUMAR, ALOK ARADHE
Divjot Sekhon – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural issues regarding admission requirements. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. analysis of admission criteria changes. (Para 6 , 8 , 10 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. impetus for policy change justification. (Para 7 , 11 , 12 , 19) |
| 4. arbitrariness and illegitimacy in altering admission policies. (Para 30 , 33 , 34) |
| 5. final order regarding admissions and consequences. (Para 36 , 38) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Leave granted.
3. The next appeal is of Shubhkarman Singh, another MBBS aspirant under sports quota during session-2024. On 12.09.2024, the same Division Bench dismissed his writ petition in CWP-23083-2024, following its decision in Divjot Sekhon’s case, a day earlier. His prayer was on the same lines as Divjot Sekhon’s. In addition thereto, he assailed the Addendum dated 03.09.2024, whereby the University informed all National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (Undergraduate) [NEET UG-2024] aspirants who applied under sports quota that sports achievements during Classes XI and XII was misprinted in the Prospectus and that they were told via email dated 16.08.2024 to submit all their sports achievements during any class/year/session in person on 19.08.2024 (upto 3 PM).
5. The last appeal pertains to A
Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation and others vs. Rajendra Bhimrao Mandve and others
K. Manjusree vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and another
Tej Prakash Pathak and others vs. Rajasthan High Court and others
Mandeep Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and others
Sivanandan C.T. and others vs. High Court of Kerala and others
Harinagar Sugar Mills Limited (Biscuit Division) and another vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Admission criteria for educational institutions must be firmly established prior to the application process to ensure transparency and prevent arbitrariness in selection, especially in competitive fi....
(1) Admission in Engineering Courses – Objective of introducing sports quota is not to accommodate academic merit but something altogether different: promotion of sports in institution, university, a....
The court established that candidates under the Sports Quota must be admitted based on their achievements, prioritizing those with higher qualifications as per the rules.
Mere representation at a National or International level does not guarantee reservation under the J&K Sports Policy. Eligibility for reservation requires outstanding proficiency and participation in ....
The MCI Regulations have overriding effect over state rules and regulations in matters of admission to professional courses.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the State to provide reservation for a particular category is subject to the State's conscious po....
The principle of estoppel applies to candidates who participate in a selection process without objection and cannot challenge the process after its completion.
The inclusion of games and their categorization for admission quota is a policy decision of the university and should not be interfered with unless completely arbitrary. Candidates cannot challenge t....
The prospectus should be interpreted to preserve the benefit of the candidate, and the substance of the candidate's achievements should be considered, especially in extraordinary circumstances such a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.