IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SANJEEV KUMAR, RAJESH SEKHRI, JJ.
State of J&K – Appellant
Versus
Verinder Singh & Anr. – Respondents
CRAA No. 41 of 2011 (O&M)
Decided on : 28-04-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and its background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's analysis on the mandatory provisions of ndps act. (Para 21 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 34 , 36) |
| 3. appellant's arguments regarding evidence evaluation. (Para 24 , 25 , 27) |
| 4. importance of compliance with evidence handling regulations. (Para 38 , 40 , 46) |
| 5. conclusion and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 51) |
JUDGMENT :
Rajesh Sekhri, J.
1. By virtue of this judgment, the present appeal hanging fire for the last more than 12 years shall be put to quietus.
2. This appeal has been directed against judgment dated 28.02.2010 rendered by learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu (hereinafter referred to as “trial court”), in File No.148/Challan titled “State of J&K v. Verinder Singh and another”, and FIR No. 34 of 2007 of Police Station, Miran Sahib for offences under Sections 353 /34 RPC, 4/25 ARMS ACT , 8/15 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act, for short) and 6/13 DCO, vide which, respondents have been acquitted of the charges.
3. Before a closer look at the grounds urged in the memo of appeal, it shall be apt to have an overview of the facts giving rise to the present case.
4. Case of the appellant-State/prosecution is that on 07.07.2007, Ajaz Ahmad, PSI along with police party of Police Station, Miran Sahib, while on patrolling received source information at about 8:00 P.M. that respondents/accused were engaged in illegal trade of Poppy straw in their house in Ward No. 6. The PSI informed and requested SDPO and SDM to reach before they rushed to the spot to apprehend accused. Respondent-accused No. 1, it is alleged, on seeing the police party made an attempt to escape in his car bearing Registration No. JK02P-8077, but his attempt was foiled and he fled from the spot leaving the car behind. PSI-Ajaz Ahmad conducted search of the car and recovered poppy straw in a polythene bag, 1000 capsules of paravanspas, 60 capsules of Spasmoproxvon, a box containing 20 bottles of Rexicof, 02 tokas and one kirch. It is further case of the prosecution case that respondent/accused No. 2, Kamaljit Kour, meanwhile attacked the police party with Kirch, but she was overpowered by a lady constable, namely, Kamlesh Kumari and was taken into custody on the spot and Kirch was seized. Report was flashed to the Police Station, Miran Sahib, consequently aforesaid FIR came to be registered and investigation was assigned to SHO, Inspector-Harjit Singh, who came to the spot and seized the car in the presence of SDM and SDPO, R.S. Pura. After rituals of formal investigation, including preparation of the site plan, formal recovery and seizures of the aforementioned drugs and weapons, the IO extracted samples of 50 grams of Poppy straw, 10 capsules each of Parvanspas and Spasmoproxvon and one bottle of Rexicof, which were sealed on the spot. It is also case of the prosecution that 600 grams of opium, 40 kg of poppy straw and a bag containing 20 kg of poppy straw were also recovered and seized on house search of the respondents, their samples of 50 grams each were also taken and after formal sealing and re-sealing all the samples were forwarded to FSL for chemical analysis. On the conclusion of investigation, since aforesaid offences were established against the respondents, a final report, in terms of Section 173 of the code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short Cr.P.C.) was filed.
5. Respondents were charged by the trial court for the aforesaid offences on 10.01.2008, whereby they pleaded innocence and claimed trial, prompting the trial Court to call for the prosecution evidence. Prosecution has examined as many as 14 witnesses.
6. In order to appreciate the prosecution evidence in the right perspective, it shall be apt to give a brief resume of the prosecution evidence, which reads thus:
7. PW-1 Ajaz Ahmad was incharge of the patrolling party at the relevant point of time, on whose report FIR against respondents came to be registered. He has stated that wh
Ganga Bhai v. State of M.P reported as 2012 (4) Crimes (HC) 687
Gurbax Singh v. State of Haryana reported as 2001 (1) Supreme 625
Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana reported as (2000) 2 SCC 513
Prem Shahi v. State of Uttrakhand reported as (2013) Supreme (UK) 162
State of Rajasthan v. Daulat Ram reported as AIR 1980 SC 1314
State of Rajasthan v. Gurmail Singh reported as AIR 2005 SC 1578
State of Rajasthan v. Tara Singh reported as 2011 (3) SCR 1112
The prosecution's failure to adhere to mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act led to serious discrepancies, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
Non-compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act and contradictions in evidence undermine the prosecution's case, leading to the reversal of conviction.
Proper investigation and compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act are crucial in cases involving severe punishment and societal impact.
Strict compliance with procedural safeguards under the NDPS Act is essential; failure to do so invalidates the prosecution's case and may lead to acquittal.
Strict compliance with the statutory provisions of the NDPS Act, particularly in cases involving the seizure and disposal of contraband, is crucial to establish the integrity of the evidence and the ....
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and failure to adhere to mandatory procedures under the NDPS Act undermines the case.
Prosecution must comply with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act; failure to establish safe custody and proper procedures leads to acquittal.
The prosecution's failure to follow mandatory procedures for search and seizure under the NDPS Act vitiated the trial, leading to the acquittal of the accused.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.