SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(JK) 319

Page 1
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR

OWP no.1759/2018
Pronounced on: 22.07.2024
Abrar Ahmad Tantray (21) S/o Fayaz Ahmad Tantray R/o Kujjar, Kulgam,
Kashmir (J&K)
…….Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr Ateeb Kanth, Advocate
Versus
1. State of J&K through Secy, Deptt of Power Dev. Deptt Civil Sectt
Sgr/Jmu
2. Dy. Commr. Kulgam
3. Chief Engineer, EM&RE Wing, Kashmir, Srinagar
4. Executive Engineer, ED Kulgam, Kashmir
5. Superintendent Engineer, Electric M&RE Circle, Bijbehara, Kashmir
……Respondent(s)
Through: Mr Alla ud din Ganai, AAG with
Ms Shaila Shameem, Assisting Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE

Enterprises engaged in hazardous activities are strictly liable for injuries caused, with no exceptions to liability, emphasizing the need for timely compensation.

Headnote:(A) Compensation for personal injury - Electric shock incident - Claim for Rs.20.00 Lacs including hospitalization and future prospects - Petitioner suffered 78% permanent disability due to electric shock at age of eight - Respondents admitted incident but delayed compensation - Court emphasized strict liability for hazardous activities. (Paras 1, 3, 9, 10, 12, 16)

(B) Liability of enterprises - Supreme Court established that enterprises engaged in hazardous activities are strictly liable for accidents caused - No exceptions apply. (Para 9)

(C) Assessment of compensation - Guidelines for compensation in MACT cases applicable - Previous judgments referenced for compensation amounts. (Paras 12, 13, 14)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, aged eight, received severe electric shock from an uncovered transformer, resulting in amputation and permanent disability. Despite acknowledgment of the incident by respondents, compensation was delayed for years.

Findings of Court:
Petitioner is entitled to Rs.20.00 Lacs as compensation with 6% interest from the date of filing.

Issues: The court addressed the delay in compensation and the extent of liability of the respondents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the respondents are strictly liable for the injuries caused due to their hazardous activity, emphasizing the need for timely compensation.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

JUDGMENT :

1. Petitioner prays to direct respondents to release compensation of Rs.20.00 Lacs in his favour which would include his hospitalization charges, operation, so long treatment, diet, transportation, care taking, mental pain and agony, future prospects and element of permanent disability. He also prays to direct official respondents to consider objectively and sympathetically petitioner for a suitable job in the said department as per his qualification so that he may not feel dependent and handicapped in his life because of aforesaid incident and can be rehabilitated permanently.

2. I have heard learned counsel for parties and considered the matter.

3. Brief facts summarized by petitioner in instant writ petition are that on 9 th March 2007, petitioner was eight years of age. He along with other children was playing near live wire electric transformer which was uncovered/uninsulated. The child/petitioner received electric shock due to a snapped 11 KV line at village Kujjar Kulgam as it was open uncovered/uninsulated electric wire which resulted in severe burn injuries on left side of his head, arm and other parts of body. He was immediately admitted to SKIMS, Srinagar. Police station Yaripora Kulgam entered a report no.4 of 11th March 2007. Statement of witnesses was recorded by police and FIR was registered. Due to high degree of electric shock, petitioner’s left arm was amputated and he obtained grievous injury in left side of head. Medical Board, Kulgam, declared him 75% disabled. District Superintendent of Police, Kulgam, got the matter verified and submitted are report to Deputy Commissioner, Kulgam, on 15th December 2009. Thereafter nothing was done by respondent, while petitioner was undergoing treatment even when his father had very little resources, yet still continued petitioner’s treatment. Plastic surgery, burns, reconstructive and micro-surgery, was being conducted by SKIMS Srinagar, which according to petitioner is evident from letter (Annexure B to writ petition). On representation of petitioner, Executive Engineer, ED Kulgam, in 2017 ordered AEE, Kulgam, to submit concrete report. It is being stated by petitioner that respondent-State admits that petitioner received a severe electric shock due to a snapped 11 KV line at village Kujjar. However, till date he has not been compensated by respondents.

4. The stand taken by respondents 1, 3 & 4 (Power Development Department), in their Reply is that petitioner while was playing near electric transformer installed in village Kujjar, got struck with electric transformer/electric wire, resulting in serious burn injuries on hand, arm and other body parts. Respondents admit that police station of Yaripora entered a report vide DD no.04 dated 11th March 2007, after which a police party was deputed to SKIMS Hospital, Srinagar, where petitioner was admitted for treatment and that statement of some of the witnesses was recorded and medical record was obtained. As per statement of Superintendent of Police, Kulgam, vide no.CRB/ INJ/ 09/15410 dated 15th December 2009, it has been found that there was no fault on the part of anyone, but the child got stuck with electric transformer/wire while playing with other children. Due to electric shock, the child received grievous injuries, amputation of left mid-fore arm and hand. Respondents state that writ petition has been filed after nine years, which is hit by delay and laches. In view of permanent damage suffered by petitioner and serious injuries, Assistant Executive Engineer, EM&RE, Sub Division, Kulgam, has recommended the case of petitioner for relief and rehabilitation on humanitarian grounds that has been forwarded by Chief Engineer, EM&RE, vide letter dated 11th October 2007 to Development Commissioner, Power.

5. In compliance to the order dated 30th January 2024, passed by this Court, petitioner has filed supplementary-affidavit. Petitioner has placed on record an Inpatient Estimate dated 31st January 2024, issued by Plu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top