SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(J&K) 736

RAJNESH OSWAL
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vipan Gandotra
For the Respondent: Amit Gupta

JUDGEMENT

1. Through the medium of the instant petition, the petitioner has sought the compensation for an amount of Rs. 50.00 lacs on account of injuries suffered by him in an incident of electrocution while performing his duty on the instructions of the respondents.

2. It is stated by the petitioner that he was engaged as a casual labourer by the respondents on consolidated wages of Rs. 3,750/- per month in the month of January, 2012. On 04.07.2012, the petitioner was directed by the Junior Engineer and Foreman to accompany other officials to Supwal to work on 11 KV line. The petitioner and the other employees, namely, Mohinder Singh and Bodh Raj were conveyed by the officers of the Power Development Department that the Department had shut down the 11 KV line for conducting the restoration work. The petitioner was directed by his superior officers to climb the electric poll and cut the fuse so as to accomplish the assigned work of restoration of electric supply. The petitioner claims to have been assured by the employees of the department that the electric supply had already be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top