SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Manipur) 23

AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
Gainichung Dangmei – Appellant
Versus
The State of Manipur – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Aaron Keishing, Advocate, for the Appellant, Mr. A. Vashum, GA, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Ahanthem Bimol Singh, J. - Heard Mr. Aaron Keishing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. A. Vashum, learned GA appearing for the respondents.

2. The present writ petition had been filed on behalf of a three years old boy claiming compensation for the injuries and physical disabilities suffered by him due to electrocution caused by sheer negligence of the authorities.

3. The petitioner is the natural father of the minor victim boy, namely, Lansingam Dangmei, and residing at an interior hill Village called Siangai Namdai (Parengba), in Senapati District of Manipur State. The petitioner and his minor son are Scheduled Tribes and belongs to a very poor family, who are below the poverty line. The petitioner is a Cultivator and a wage earner for daily food. According to the petitioner, the respondents installed a high voltage electric transformer (Transformer-II) nearby a road side within the residential areas of the petitioner's village without any protected fencing or precautionary notice against possibility of danger of electric shock. On the fateful day, i.e., on 13-11-2014, the petitioner's son, who was only three years old at that time, was playing a ball wit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top