SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(JK) 111

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, J
Irfan Ahmad Teli – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Of J&k – Respondent
HCP No. 137/2024



Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. M. Amin, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. M. Amin, Advocate

Preventive detention requires specific grounds and independent application of mind by the detaining authority; mere reproduction of police dossiers is insufficient.

Headnote:(A) J&K Public Safety Act, 1978 - Section 8 - Preventive detention - Quashing of detention order - Detenu placed under preventive detention for alleged anti-social activities - Grounds of detention found vague and lacking specificity - No cogent reasons provided by detaining authority for detention - Detention order quashed due to non-application of mind. (Paras 1, 5, 10, 14)

(B) Preventive Detention - Legal standards - Detaining authority must apply its own mind and cannot merely reproduce police dossier - Mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention unless activities threaten public order. (Paras 8, 12, 13)

Facts of the case:
The detenu was placed under preventive detention by the District Magistrate, Srinagar, on grounds of being a chronic troublemaker and creating public disorder. The petitioner challenged the detention order, arguing it was vague and lacked legal basis. (Paras 1, 4)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the grounds of detention were a mere reproduction of the police dossier, indicating a lack of independent application of mind by the detaining authority. (Paras 10, 14)

Issues: Whether the grounds of detention were sufficiently specific and whether the detaining authority applied its mind to the facts of the case. (Paras 5, 8)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the detaining authority must provide specific grounds for detention and cannot rely solely on police reports; the activities must pose a genuine threat to public order. (Paras 10, 12)

Result: Detention order quashed and detenu directed to be set at liberty.

JUDGMENT :

1. Through the medium of this writ petition, Order No.DMS/PSA/03/2024 dated 29.03.2024, passed by District Magistrate, Srinagar, whereby detenu, namely, Irfan Ahmad Teli S/o Abdul Majeed Teli R/o Mukhdoom Mohalla Naseem Bagh, Srinagar, has been placed under preventive detention with a view to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, is sought to be quashed and the detenu set at liberty on the grounds made mention of therein.

2. Respondents have filed counter affidavit, insisting therein that the detenu came into contact with antisocial elements who motivated him to indulged in anti-social and antinational activities in order to disturb the public peace and order and subsequently in a short span of time, the detenu got more confidence and became one of prominent nuisance/ trouble monger vagabond, chronic street fighter, miscreant and cheater in his area. The activities narrated in the grounds of detention have been reiterated in the reply affidavit filed by respondents. The factual averments that detenu was not supplied with relevant material relied upon in the grounds of detention have been refuted. It is insisted that all the relevant material, which has been relied upon by the detaining authority, was provided to the detenu at the time of execution of warrant.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered the matter. I have gone through the detention record produced by counsel for respondents.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner would state that grounds of detention are completely vague indefinite, cryptic and do not specify any specific allegations against the detenu; that grounds of detention that the detenu being a staunch cheater/fraudster and have cheated the general masses in District Srinagar; inasmuch as there is only one FIR No. 73/2023 U/S 353- IPC registered in Police Station, Nigeen and in this regard cases before different courts are presently pending adjudication.

5. Learned counsel for petitioner vehemently avers that allegations in aforesaid FIR supra do not fall within the ambit of Section 8 as is defined under J&K Public Safety Act 1978, and, therefore, there is total non- application of mind on the part of the detaining authority as the allegations mentioned in grounds of detention are contrary to law qua Section 8 of the Act. Even if, allegations mentioned in grounds of detention assumingly are true, yet those would not fall as public order as is denied in terms of Section 8 (3) (b) of PSA inasmuch as there is no proximate link between the grounds of detention and the eminent threat to the public order.

6. Further submission of learned counsel for petitioner is that impugned detention order is without application of mind as there is no cogent reason for respondent no.2 to pass the detention order inasmuch as criminal law has already been set into motion against detenu. It is also averred that the detaining authority has not given any justification or cogent reason for passing of impugned order as to how the activities of the detenu are prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, hence the detention order has no proximity with the procedure as envisaged under law. He would also contend that grounds of detention are replica of dossier submitted by police and there is no independent application of mind by respondent.

7. Per contra, learned counsel for respondents insists that detention order has been passed on subjective satisfaction by detaining authority and detention order is in accordance with law and there is no violation or infringement of rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India. Hence, he pleads that petition be dismissed. It is also stated that the detenu being a staunch cheater/fraudster and has cheated the general masses in District Srinagar and his aim and object is to create disturbance in social order/public order in the Kashmir valley by way of his evil designs and there are serious allegations levelled against the de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top