IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
RAHUL BHARTI, J.
Rajnesh Sharma S/o Sh. Bansi Lal - Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir Through Commissioner/Secretary – Respondent
CRM(M) No. 690 of 2022 CrlM No. 1265 of 2023 CrlM No. 1431 of 2022 CrlM No. 478 of 2023
Decided on : 20-08-2024
(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 306 - Quashing of FIR - Allegations of abetment of suicide against a teacher based on a suicide note - The court found no evidence of instigation or intent to push the student to suicide, emphasizing that mere reference in a suicide note does not suffice for abetment - The FIR was quashed as an abuse of process of law. (Paras 44, 45)
(B) Abetment of Suicide - Definition and requirements - The court reiterated that abetment requires a clear intention to instigate or aid the act of suicide, which was not established in this case. (Paras 15, 19, 20)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner, an Assistant Professor, was accused of abetting the suicide of a student through a suicide note that mentioned his name. The note did not specify any actionable grievance against the petitioner. (Paras 3, 4, 13)
Findings of Court:
The court found that the allegations did not meet the threshold for abetment under Section 306 IPC, as there was no evidence of intent or instigation. (Paras 44, 45)
Issues: Whether the petitioner’s actions constituted abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC based on the suicide note. (Paras 14, 19)
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the mere mention of a name in a suicide note does not establish abetment; there must be clear evidence of instigation or intent to cause the suicide. (Paras 19, 20)
Result: FIR No. 110/2022 quashed.
JUDGMENT :
01. Heard Mr. Supreet Singh Johal, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Dewakar Sharma, learned Dy. AG for the respondents.
02. The petitioner is an Assistant Professor (Political Science)posted in the Government Degree College (in short, "GDC"), Kathua. The petitioner’s posting as an Assistant Professor (Political Science) in GDC, Kathua dates back to 17.07.2017 and is also said to be the Head of the Political Science Department of the GDC, Kathua.
03. One of 1st semester students of GDC, Kathua, namely, Sanjay Kumar S/o Bodh Raj R/o Baghe Chak, tehsil & district Kathua committed suicide on 23.03.2022 at his home.
04. By reference to a purported suicide note said to have been penned down by said Sanjay Kumar in his own handwriting, an FIR no. 110/2022 for alleged commission of offence under section 306 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 came to be registered by the Police Station, Kathua, therein naming the petitioner, as an accused, resulting in his arrest and consequent suspension from service as well.
05. The suicide note which came to form the purported basis of registration of the FIR no. 110/2022 is reproduced here under:-
"Suicide Note – meri life mai bahot ache ache dost aay or unhone mera har waqat sath deyia especially NCC walo ne hamarey senior ka main bahut shukor guzar hoon ki unhoney hamey bahut sari opportunity di but Dosto aaj k baad mai apsi shyd kabi na mill saku kyuki college mai ek teacher hai jinka naam Rajnesh Sharma (Political Science) jin ki wajah se mein suicide commit kar raha Apka priya Miter Sanjay Miss u Mom, dad, Sister, Brothers and friends aur chahta hu ki uss teacher par strictly action liya jaye inko mainey bahut samjhayia lekin inhome meri ek nahi suni I request to administration to strictly take action on Rajnesh sharma (Political Science) Thank u, Miss U apka friend sanjay."
06. The petitioner came to be admitted to an interim bail in terms of an order dated 08.04.2022 by the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kathua which order later on came to be made absolute in terms of an order dated 12.04.2022. The petitioner even came to be put under suspension from duty in terms of an order dated 12.04.2022 passed by the Authority concerned.
07. Finding himself exposed to suffer a criminal investigation and prospective prosecution in the face of said FIR no. 110/2022, the petitioner came forward petitioning this Court with present petition filed on 13.09.2022 invoking jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 thereby seeking quashment of said FIR no. 110/2022 terming it as frivolous, baseless and misconceived against him amounting to an abuse of process of law pleading that the facts and circumstances, by no stretch of imagination, can implicate the petitioner with an accusation of abetment of suicide of Sanjay Kumar.
08. In his present petition, the petitioner has referred to the fact that he came to be taken by surprise upon his arrest on 23.03.2022 at about 05:00 PM for the reason which, at that point of time, was unknown to him but later on stood revealed that one of the students of GDC, Kathua, namely, Sanjay Kumar was found dead in suspicious circumstances with a suicide note allegedly written by him therein mentioning the petitioner’s name.
09. The petitioner has referred to the fact that he came to notify the shortage in attendance of said Sanjay Kumar on account of the fact that the petitioner was taking the Political Science classes of Semester 1st, 3rd & 5th students of GDC, Kathua and was under a duty to notify the shortage in attendance of the absentee students which included the deceased Sanjay Kumar.
10. The fact of shortage in attendance was duly notified by the petitioner on the College Notice Board on 15.03.2022 in which names of ninety one (91) students were enlisted with respect to attendance shortage bearing against them for the purpose of enabling the defaulting students to represent to the petitioner to show cause with respect to the shortage
Abetment of suicide requires clear evidence of intent to instigate or aid the act; mere mention in a suicide note is insufficient for prosecution under Section 306 IPC.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for the offence of abetment under Section 306 of the IPC, there must be a clear mens rea and an active or direct act leading the deceased to c....
1. At the stage when the High Court considers a petition for quashing under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C, the test to be applied is whether the allegations in the complaint as they stand, without adding....
306. Abetment of suicide.—If any person commits suicide, whoever abets commission of such suicide, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, ....
Single WhatsApp message alleging threats insufficient for prima facie abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC without evidence of instigation, mens rea or proximate act compelling suicide; FIR quas....
The court emphasized the need for thorough investigation into allegations of instigation to commit suicide, as indicated by the suicidal note and video clipping.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that mere harassment without positive action would not amount to an offence under Section 306 IPC, emphasizing the need for active instigation or f....
To establish abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC, there must be clear evidence of instigation or direct causation linked to the act of suicide, which was not present in this case.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.