S. No. 13 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAK H AT JAMM U CM No. 4987/2021
1. Suresh Kumar, age 64 years S/o Sh. Chaman Lal, R/o H.No. 01, KC Enclave, Near KC Public School, Akhnoor Road, Jammu.
2. Madan Lal, age 62 years S/o Sh. Sain Dass, R/o 32/2 Shyam Vihar, Agriculture Complex Road, Talab Tillo, Jammu.
3. Sanjay Kumar Gupta, age 57 years S/o Sh Chaman Lal, R/o H.No. 02, KC Enclave, Near KC Pubic School, Akhnoor Road, Jammu.
4. Raj Kumar Bhagat, age 51 years S/o Sh. Shiv Ram, R/o H.No. 34, KC or Colony Muthi, Akhnoor Road, Jammu. …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. S K Anand, Advocate V s
1. Union of India through the Administrative Commandant, Station Headquarter, Domana, Jammu C/O 56 APO
2. Officer Commanding, 64 Field Workshop Coy, Poonch Lines, Jammu.
3. Deputy Commissioner, Wazarat Road, Jammu. ...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sandeep Gupta, CGSC Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDG E
JUDGMENT :
01. In the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs:
i) All the present writ petition.
ii) Issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of MANDAMUS directing and commanding the respondents to furnish copy of the Sketch Pan prepared in pursuance to Section 3 of the Works of Defenct Act, 1903 to the petitioners with regard to the lands which have come under the Prohibition Clause with regard to Station Headquarter Domana as Notified under Part-B of the Annexure-IV.
iii) Any other relief just and appropriate in the given facts and circumstances of the case which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and just may also be granted in favour of the petitioners in order to meet the ends of justice.
02. The facts as stated in the petition on the strength of which the aforesaid reliefs have been prayed are that the petitioners have purchased small parcels of land measuring, 5, 10, 15 and 20 marlas respectively in Revenue Village Paloura, Jammu near 64 Field Workshop Coy on the link road from Udheywala, Gajansoo Road to Mayank Cricket Academy, Akhnoor Road, Jammu and intended to raise construction as well as effect repairs of their residential houses existed on the said parcels of land which raising of construction and effecting repairs came to be obstructed by the respondents, on the premise that raising of construction upon the land in question is prohibited under the Works of Defence Act, 1903 and that despite the respondent-3 herein clarified the issue vide his letter dated 09.01.2021 addressed to the respondents 2 and 3 herein that the Army Station located in an area has to be identified in terms of the NOC/guidelines dated 21.10.2016 issued by the Government of India without stretching the said NOC/guidelines to other areas and also not to cause undue harassment to the civilians in constructing their residential houses on their own land/plots, the respondents continued to cause unnecessary interference to the petitioners into the construction/ renovation activities of their residential houses undertaken by them, thus necessitating the filing of the instant petition before this Court for seeking the aforesaid reliefs.
03. Objections to the petition have been filed by the respondents 1 and 2, wherein the petition is being opposed on the premise that the petition raises disputed questions of facts incapable of being adjudicated upon by this Court in exercise of extraordinary writ jurisdiction and that the petitioners are raising constructions within 100 meters from the outer wall/boundary of the Military establishment without any NOC sought from the Military Authorities and that raising of such constructions is violation of policy laid down by the Government of India contained in letter dated 18.05.2011 and since the petitioners have raised construction unauthorizedly, as such, the said constructions are liable to be demolished, and that the NOC/guidelines dated 21.10.2016 relied upon by the petitioners are under review and cannot be deemed to be applicable and that 64 Field Workshop Coy being adjacent to the constructions in question is a unit under Station Headquarter, Domana approximately 02km away from Brigade Headquarter location and falls within construction prohibited area. Stating further that since 64 Field Workshop Coy is part of the Army Station, Domana and that the petitioner-2 being an ex-State Government employee has managed an approval for raising constructions from Jammu Municipal Corporation while relying on the NOC/guidelines of 2016 and that the clarification furnished by the Additional District Development Commissioner, Jammu contained in letter dated 09.01.2021 are baseless and incorrect based on the NOC/guidelines of 2016 which are under review, and that the response submitted to an application under Right of Information Act, 2009 by one Colonel Rajdeep Thapa that the Sketch Plan of the land upto 100 meters from outer wall of the
The absence of a valid declaration and Sketch Plan under the Works of Defence Act, 1903, renders any interference with construction activities unlawful.
Restrictions on building permits related to military establishments require valid declarations and notifications under the Works of Defence Act, 1903 to be enforceable.
The Works of Defence Act, 1903, and its guidelines take precedence over local municipal laws regarding construction near military installations, emphasizing that national security concerns outweigh i....
Abeyance of superseding defence circular does not revive prior ones; construction rights crystallize under interim regime permissions; NOC not mandatory beyond 50m without statutory backing or state ....
Amendments to building rules by the State do not violate national security laws, and enforcement of the Works of Defence Act is the responsibility of the Union authorities.
Writ proceedings cannot conclusively resolve factual questions of land ownership; a joint inspection is mandated for clarity and just resolution.
The court established that existing permanent constructions completed before the issuance of a restrictive Notification under the Works of Defence Act are exempt from such restrictions, permitting th....
In the absence of any provision in Section 3 of the Act concerning the ancillary units of the works of defence such as lodger units in the case on hand, or of any site intended to be used or to be ac....
Point of Law : No such 'NOC' from Defence Authority would be necessary if construction is beyond 10 meters from outer wall of defence installation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.