Back
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SANJEEV KUMAR, SANJAY PARIHAR
Nath Singh – Appellant
Versus
High Court of J&K and Ladakh – Respondent
Judgment :
Sanjeev Kumar, J.
SWP No.2190/2001 & SWP No.2206/2001
The petitioners do not wish to press these writ petitions. Accordingly, both the writ petitions stand dismissed as not pressed.
SWP No.1957/2001
1 The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the impugned select list dated 19.07.2001 issued for the post of Junior Assistant in the Subordinate Courts by respondent No.2 on the recommendation of the Selection Committee. The petitioners have also prayed for a writ of mandamus directing respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider their candidature for the said post strictly in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations.
2 Briefly stated, the case set up by the petitioners is that vide Advertisement Notification dated 07.04.1997, applications were invited from eligible candidates possessing the qualification of 10+2 or its equivalent. The last date for submission was extended vide notice dated 24.02.1998. The petitioners submitted their applications, appeared in the written examination, and qualified. They were subsequently called for a viva voce test conducted at t
Participation in selection process with knowledge of criteria estops candidates from challenging it after failure.
Employment and Service matter - Grade-IV employees - Selection process - Selection process is not subject matter of challenge in absence of any grounds, subsequent action of issuing appointment order....
Recruitment processes must adhere to consistent criteria as set in advertisements, and allegations of irregularities must be substantiated with evidence.
The completion of a recruitment process and subsequent appointments preclude challenges to the selection list, but individuals retain the right to contest specific appointments that may violate legal....
Selection decisions must be justified and not arbitrary, ensuring fairness in administrative processes.
Candidates participating in the selection process without objection are estopped from challenging the process later. Pleading of malafides is necessary for allegations of improper conduct.
Candidates participating in a selection process without protest cannot challenge the results afterward. Writ petitions may not be maintainable without impleading selected candidates.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
