Back
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, C. KUMARAPPAN
S. Jayabharathi – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms – Respondent
ORDER :
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned Selection List dated 27.02.2016 published by the 2nd respondent Principal District Judge, Dindigul in their official web-site for recruitment to the posts of Senior Bailiff, quash the same in so far as it omits the Roster Point 2 intended for Scheduled Caste (Arunthathiyars) – W/DW – Priority, and further direct the 2nd respondent Principal District Judge to consider the Petitioner for appointment to the said post against the said Roster Point 2 intended for Scheduled Caste (Arunthathiyars) – W/DW – Priority in the said post.
The writ petition has been instituted challenging Selection List dated 27.02.2016 published by the Principal District Judge, Dindigul in their official web-site for recruitment to the posts of Senior Bailiff and to direct the Principal District Judge to consider the petitioner for appointment to the said post against the said Roster Point 2 intended for Scheduled Caste (Arunthathiyars) – W/DW – Priority in the said post.
2. Admittedly, the recruitment process had b
The completion of a recruitment process and subsequent appointments preclude challenges to the selection list, but individuals retain the right to contest specific appointments that may violate legal....
A completed recruitment process cannot be challenged unless there are legal violations in the appointment orders.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of maintaining the rank list and seniority for selected candidates, as governed by Regulation 97 of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board....
The recruitment process must ensure equal treatment of all candidates, upholding constitutional principles of fairness and non-discrimination.
The absence of a legal provision for revaluation of answer sheets in recruitment processes limits the court's ability to intervene in evaluation disputes.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
