JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. R.C.P. Sah, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Heard Mr. Md. Hatim, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party – State.

3. This revision application has been filed challenging the correctness and legality or propriety of the judgment dated 19.03.2009 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Seraikella-Kharswan in Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 2005 whereby he has upheld the conviction/sentence of the petitioner passed by the learned S.D.J.M., Seraikella.

4. The petitioner was sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for four months for offence under Section 417 of Indian Penal Code and Simple Imprisonment for six months for offence under Section 500/34 of Indian Penal Code. The co-accused parents of the petitioner were also sentenced for Simple Imprisonment for six months for offence under Section 500/34 of Indian Penal Code. The judgment of the trial court was passed in Trial No. 100 of 2005/C/1 Case No. 37 of 2002.

5. The learned appellate court confirmed the conviction and sentence of the petitioner and acquitted the co-accused parents of the petitioner.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this