SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 273

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Ram Sewak Mahto, Son of Budhu Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Heard Mr. Nilesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.

2. Heard Ms. Neha Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2.

3. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party - State.

4. The present criminal revision application has been filed against the judgment dated 27.01.2012 passed in Criminal Appeal No.133 of 2008 by learned District and Sessions Judge III, Ranchi, by which appeal preferred on behalf of the petitioners against the order of conviction and sentence dated 21.08.2008 passed in connection with Complaint Case No.15 of 1997 T.R. No.471 of 2008 has been dismissed. The petitioners have been convicted for offence under Sections 323, 341 and 379 of Indian Penal Code passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Ranchi.

The petitioners were sentenced for one-year simple imprisonment under Section 379 of Indian Penal Code, 6 months simple imprisonment under Section 323 of Indian Penal Code and 15 days simple imprisonment under Section 341 of Indian Penal Code.

Arguments on behalf of the Petitioners

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top