IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
RAVI RANJAN, SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD, JJ
Jolsan Kujur - Petitioners
Versus
State of Jharkhand - Respondents
W.P. (S) No. 2592 of 2020
Decided On : 16-06-2021
Ultra Vires - Pay-Scale Disparity - Rule 13 of Regulation, 2014 - Summary of Acts and Sections: Rule 13 of Regulation, 2014 - The court examined the validity of Rule 13 of Regulation, 2014, which dealt with the salary and allowances of RIMS employees. The petitioners claimed that the provision was ultra vires to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. The court analyzed the constitutional validity of the provision and found that the claim did not fall under the fold of unreasonable classification, as the petitioners and the employees of AIIMS, New Delhi were in different establishments. The court also emphasized that the pay-scale is the absolute domain of the employer and cannot be subject to judicial review unless discrimination exists among similarly situated employees.
Fact of the Case:
The writ petitioners, Class III employees of RIMS, Ranchi, sought parity in pay-scale with employees of AIIMS, New Delhi, under Rule 13 of Regulation, 2014. They claimed that the provision was ultra vires to Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the claim of the writ petitioners did not fall under the fold of unreasonable classification, as they were in different establishments from the employees of AIIMS, New Delhi. The court emphasized that the pay-scale is the absolute domain of the employer and cannot be subject to judicial review unless discrimination exists among similarly situated employees.
Issues: The issues revolved around the constitutional validity of Rule 13 of Regulation, 2014 and the claim of the writ petitioners for parity in pay-scale with employees of AIIMS, New Delhi.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the claim of the writ petitioners did not fall under the fold of unreasonable classification, as they were in different establishments from the employees of AIIMS, New Delhi. The court emphasized that the pay-scale is the absolute domain of the employer and cannot be subject to judicial review unless discrimination exists among similarly situated employees.
Final Decision: The writ petition failed and was dismissed by the court.
JUDGMENT :
With consent of the parties, hearing of the matter has been done through video conferencing and there is no complaint whatsoever regarding audio and visual quality.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:
(ii). For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to fix the pay scale and other allowances of the petitioners (Class III employees of RIMS, Ranchi) at par and equivalent to the employees of All India Medical Science) (hereinafter referred as AIIMS) and other similar institution, since the qualifications, experiences, and nature of work of petitioners are exactly similar to employees of AIIMS and other institutions, but the pay-scale of the petitioners are much below than employees of AIIMS and other institutions managed by Central Govt.
3. The brief facts of the case, which are required to be referred herein, as per the pleadings made in the writ petition, read hereunder as:
In pursuance to the advertisement being Advertisement No. 5414 dated 20.09.2003 issued from the office of Director, RIMS, Ranchi, for contractual appointment on the posts of Lab Technicians, Pharmacists, O.T. Assistant, Dresser, the writ petitioners applied and were appointed on the said posts. Consequently, they joined their respective posts in the month of February and March, 2006 in Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi (in short “RIMS, Ranchi”) and continued to discharge their duties to the satisfaction of the authorities of the RIMS, Ranchi.
In the year 2015, the respondent-RIMS further floated an advertisement as contained in Memo No. 7583 dated 07.11.2015 for regular appointment of Paramedicals (Lab Technicians, Pharmacists, O.T. Assistant and Dresser), who have work experience of eight years on the respective posts. The writ petitioners, fulfilling all eligibility criteria, applied for and on being found successful were appointed in the regular establishment of RIMS, Ranchi, as would be evident from letter as contained in Memo No. 8854 dated 26.12.2015. Since then they are working on the said posts to the satisfaction to the authorities of RIMS, Ranchi.
It is the case of the writ petitioners that the pay-scale as well as Dearness Allowance (D.A.) was fixed by the RIMS, Ranchi in the light of notification dated 25.03.2009 as contained in Memo No. 965 issued under the signature of Secretary, Department of Planning-cum-Finance, Government of Jharkhand. Thereafter, again the pay-scale as well as D.A. of the writ petitioners was fixed in the light of resolution dated 20.04.2013 as contained in Memo No. 995 issued under the Signature of Principal Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand by the order of H.E., the Governor, Jharkhand.
In the year 2014, the State Government came up with a regulation, namely, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences Regulation, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “Regulation, 2014”) published in the official Gazette of the State Government dated 22.09.2014.
Rule -13 of the said Regulation, 2014 speaks about salary and other allowances of the RIMS employees. According to the writ petiti
State of T.N. and Another v. P. Krishnamurthy and Others (2006) 4 SCC 517
Om Narain Agarwal & Ors Vs. Nagar Palika
State of Jammu & Kashmir vs. Shri Triloki Nath Khosa and Ors.
Air India v. Nergesh Meerza and others (1981) 4 SCC 335
Shalimar Tar Products Ltd Vs. H.C. Sharma & Ors AIR 1988 SC 145
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.