Nepal Hembram vs State of Jharkhand - 2021 Supreme(Jhk) 654

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(Jhk) 654

ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
Nepal Hembram – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent

ORDER :

1. Heard Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr. Rev. No. 409/2012 assisted by Ms. Neetu Singh, Advocate.

2. Heard Mr. Rajiv Lochan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in Cr. Rev. No. 535/2012.

3. Heard Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P. and Mr. Tapas Roy, A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the Opposite Party-State in Cr. Rev. No. 535/2012 and Cr. Rev. No. 409/2012 respectively.

4. Both these criminal revision petitions are directed against the Judgments dated 17.04.2012 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jamtara in Criminal Appeal No. 05/2012 and Criminal Appeal No. 03/2012 respectively whereby and whereunder the Judgment of conviction and the order of sentence of the petitioners namely, Nepal Hembram and Dilip Mandal passed by the learned trial court has been upheld and both the criminal appeals have been dismissed.

5. The learned trial court, vide Judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 19.12.2011 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara in G.R. No. 301 of 1998/ T.R. No. 233 of 2011 arising out of Jamtara (Mihijam) P.S. Case No. 135/1998 dated 20.07.1998, had convicted both the petitioners n