HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
T. Amarnath Goud, J.
Rajkumar Chakma - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura - Respondent
Crl. Rev. Petn. 20 of 2018
Decided On : 15-03-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition structure and initial facts (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. registration and investigation of the case (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. trial process with evidence and witnesses (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. trial court's decisions on charges (Para 12) |
| 5. outcome of appeal and review petition (Para 14 , 15 , 28) |
| 6. counsels' arguments on discrepancies (Para 17 , 19 , 21) |
| 7. legal analysis of evidence and procedure (Para 22 , 23 , 26) |
JUDGMENT
T. Amarnath Goud, J. - This is a petition under Section 397(1) read with Section 401 of the CrPC, 1973 against the dismissal of appeal vide order dated 05.04.2018 in Criminal Appeal No. 02 of 2016 of the revision petitioner passed by the Judge, North Tripura, Dharmanagar in connection with Crl. (A) 02 of 2016 which was arising out of order dated 05.12.2015 passed by Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kanchanpur, North Tripura, in case No. GR 106 of 2012.
2. The brief fact of the prosecution is that one Soniyel Reang @ Saniyel Rai Reang of Chutta Kangrai, P/S-Kanchanpur, North Tripura on being convicted by the Ld. Court of Additional Session Judge Dharmanagar, North Tripura in connection with Kanchanpur P/S Case No. 02/2008, U/S. 302 of IPC preferred appeal against the said order of conviction and sentenced before the Hon'ble Gauhati High Court, Agartala Bench, Agartala claiming himself to be juvenile at the time of the commission of the offence, which was alleged to have taken place on 06.01.2008. In support of his contention said Soniel Reang @ Saniyel Rai Reang produced a photocopy of the Transfer Certificate bearing Serial No. 130082, Damcherra, North Tripura, wherein, the date of birth of said Soniyel Reang @ Saniyeal Rai Reang as per Admission Register was alleged to have been recorded as 02.07.1992. The same was taken up for hearing by the Hon'ble High Court for order on 29.05.2012. The Hon'ble High Court by its order dated 25.09.2012 in the said application was pleased to direct an inquiry to be made into the age of the said Soniyel Reang @ Saniyeal Rai Reang. In pursuant to the said order Ld. Additional District and Session Judge, Dharmanagar, North Tripura submitted his Enquiry Report dated 15.06.2012 in the said case along with the Enquiry Report which was again listed for hearing before the Hon'ble High Court for order. The Hon'ble High court after considering the said enquiry report and in the interest of justice by order dated 26.06.2012, was pleased to direct the Headmaster/Headmistress/Teacher-in-Charge of Thumsaraipara S.B. School to produce the Admission Register and also the register/recorded of Transfer Certificate of the said school in respect of the said then convict-appellant Sri Soniyel Reang before the Hon'ble High Court on 22.06.2012. In compliance of the said order dated 20.06.2012 Sri Raj Kumar Chakma, who was then Teacher-in-Charge of the said Thumsaraipra, J.B. School at the relevant point of time, who issued the said "Transfer Certificate" in questioned, appeared before the Hon'ble High Court on 26.06.2012 with the school admission register along with another Sri Ardhendu Kumar, the then Teacher-in-Charge of the said school at that relevant point of period, who took over the charge of the said school from said Raj Kumar Chakma on 31.12.2012. The Hon'ble High Court found the "Students Admission Register" of the said school to have contained apparent manipulation in the serial bearing No. 195 of Page No. 21 of the said Admission Register Because of the said prima-facie manipulation found in the said "Students Admission Register" the subsequent serial numbers, in respect of the names of the students was alleged to have been altered or changed in the said Register. Consequently, finding prima-facie manipulation in the said "Transfer Certificate" which was issued on 26.08.2011 in favour of the said then convict appellant namely, Sri Soniyel Reang @ Saniyel Rai Reang. Hon'ble High Court is then regarded the same as forged document and the person issued the said "Transfer Certificate" was pri
Mandhari vs. State of Chhattisgarh
State of Maharashtra vs. Ashok Chotelal Shukla
AI
Prosecution must prove charges beyond reasonable doubt and follow proper procedures in framing charges; failure to do so may result in acquittal.
The prosecution must establish all elements of the alleged offences beyond a reasonable doubt, and the burden of proof never shifts to the accused. In the absence of credible evidence linking the acc....
The court upheld the conviction for forgery and cheating, allowing probation instead of imprisonment due to the petitioner's circumstances.
The prosecution failed to establish essential elements of forgery and use of a forged document, leading to the appellant's conviction being unsustainable.
The use of a forged document to misrepresent qualifications for employment constitutes cheating and forgery under IPC and corruption under relevant statutes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the abuse of process of law and the exercise of inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the impugned FIR and all crimi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.