SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Santosh Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
In these three Cr.M.Ps, common F.I.R and cognizance order are under challenge and that is why all these petitions are being heard and disposed of together.
2. Heard Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, the learned counsel [in Cr.MP 1893/20 and Cr.MP 1079/18], Mr. Manoj Kumar and Mr. Arvind Prajapati, the learned counsels [in Cr.MP No.1086/18] appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Mrs. Priya Shrestha [in Cr.MP 1086/18], Mr. Rajesh Kumar and Mr. V.S. Sahay, [in Cr.MP 1893/20 and Cr.MP 1079/18] the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondent State.
3. The petitioners have prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Daltonganj Town P.S.Case No.382 of 2017, corresponding to G.R.Case No.2536 of 2017 including the order taking cognizance dated 15.01.2018, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palamau at Daltonganj.
4. The F.I.R was instituted alleging therein that :
The Deputy Collector (Establishment) has lodged the First Information Report alleging therein that on 05.11.2017 an examination for appointment of 4th grade was conducted at 26 different centres and thereafter a committee consisting four members was made for counselling. It has been furt
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.