NAVNEET KUMAR
Kalpu Mahto – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This appeal is preferred against the Judgment of Conviction and order of sentence dated 25th July 2003, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-VIII, Hazaribagh, in S.T. No.315 of 1987, whereby the accused appellants Kalpu Mahto, Premdhari Mahto and Tribhuwan Mahto have been convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 148 and 326 of IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for one year u/s 148 of IPC and 2 ½ years u/s 326 of IPC and further the convicts Govind Mahto, Jugan Mahto (since deceased during pendency of appeal) and Rameshwar Mahto are sentenced to undergo imprisonment for a period of six months under Section 147 IPC and R.I. for 2 ½ years u/s 326 of IPC and all the aforesaid accused persons were also sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.500/- each u/s 326 IPC and in default of payment of fine, one month imprisonment was further awarded.
2. It appears from the record that the accused-appellant no.2 Jagan Mahto s/o Late Khedan Mahto had expired during pendency of this appeal and the learned APP has filed an affidavit to that effect by which it appears that the said accused-appellant no.2 Jagan Mahto s/o Late Khedan Mahto has died about 14 years ago and the l
The main legal point established in the judgment is the evaluation of evidence to determine the nature of injuries and the presence of intention or knowledge to cause death, leading to the alteration....
Insufficiency of evidence to prove charges beyond a reasonable doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.