DEEPAK ROSHAN
Hamriuddin Mian – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Pursuant to the order dated 01.04.2022 notice was issued to the petitioners in Cr. Revision No.312 of 2005, Cr. Revision No.223 of 2005 & petitioner no.1 & 3 in Cr. Revision No.311 of 2005. A service report has been received indicating therein that petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 in Cr. Revision No.312 of 2005 have died and as per supplementary affidavit dated 10.08.2017 petitioner no.2 in Cr. Revision no. 311 of 2005 has died on 08.09.2009. The notices have been served upon rest of the petitioners in all cases.
3. In view of the aforesaid fact, the revision application is dismissed as abated against petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 in Cr. Revision No.312 of 2005 & Petitioner No.2 in Cr. Revision No.311 of 2005.
4. Since the revision applications i.e. Cr. Rev. No. 312 of 2005 and Cr. Rev. No. 223 of 2005 arise out of common judgment passed by the appellate court and are also interconnected with the same P.S. case, as such both are heard together and disposed of by this common judgment.
5. Further, the issue involved in the aforesaid two revision applications are also similar to Criminal Revision No. 311 of 2005, and such, same is also heard alon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.